How do you know that? Did you you see the log files what your tool did? This is just an assumption you have no proof for at all…
1 Like
This is what my AI tool does. And yes I am totally aware that the face is changed. I do not insist that the tool does not
2 Likes
To be honest, in this case, the result is a…wow
Maybe because the original pic had a much better quality ?
Could be. Took almost one minute to render so it is truely generated.
And now looking at this pic, i can not see anything in common. There are two totally different persons/faces. This is what i keep trying to explain
3 Likes
That’s completely untrue. I’ve got two eyes. I can plainly see what, if anything, has changed in any picture I edit.
You keep talking about raw data, which you know is completely irrelevant in this situation. None of us have access to any raw data, and even if we did the size of the image would be totally prohibitive for posting in the forum. That’s assuming we could even post a raw data image.
This is positively false. This image has increased brightness.
This image has increased exposure.
You can see the differences more easily in Ricci’s hands and face, as well as the wall, curtain and camera behind him.
This is also false. I have no problem whatsoever editing faces that are not looking directly at the camera.
None of the image editors I use change the shape of a person’s face or alter it in any way, unless I specifically tell it to, which I never do because I don’t like that. And if any editor I used ever changed the shape of someone’s face, I would drop it like a hot potato.
Let me ask you the same question I’ve asked John. I posted three pictures in Ricci’s topic. Compare those three pictures and tell me they are different. To be clear, I’m talking about the pictures in this post. The first picture is John’s original with no changes, whatsoever, then the two edits.
While you’re at it, these three pictures are already the same size. You don’t have to enlarge or reduce anything, which, of course, would automatically change the shape of a face in half a heartbeat. Overlay those three pictures, or just one at a time over John’s original.
No you actually didn’t. You posted a completely different picture, which is totally irrelevant to the picture I edited.
John, you present yourself as quite intelligent, but when it suits you, you play dumb. You know exactly what the question is. I’ve asked you at least three times, now.
Compare the three cropped pictures in this post, and tell me they are different. That’s the question, John. The first one is your original picture with no changes made, followed by the two edited photos.
The AI did not generate her face, John, only the surrounding foreground and background. Nothing more.
I’ve told you that several times now, but you refuse to acknowledge it. You won’t even hear it. You think if you say something enough times, it’s automatically true. The AI did not generate her face, full stop. That is the truth. What you keep saying is false.
Why won’t you answer my question? What are you afraid of?
Answer my question.
I told you exactly how I know that, Jabba. I looked at the before and after pictures and saw that they were the same, except for the exposure.
The quality of these faces has changed, e.g. better focus, less contrast, etc. But, the shape of their faces has not changed by even a single pixel.
I think you’re simply playing games with me and my patience now. How on earth i haven’t, when i posted pic after pic with her ???/
Off course. I posted a frontal and with much better light pics so you can see how she’s actually looking like. How to be irrelevant ? The pics i posted, are showing the actual reality.
The answer is simple: the first two pics are not different. The third one, made with AI, is different
You still don’t understand the problem. You cropped a pic showing only a part of her face (from one side) and then used that pic to generate a portrait pic. The result is simply hideous and has nothing in common with how that girl looks like in reality. That’s why i kept posting frontal pic after pic with her. To show you how bad doing that action changed the reality
Can we at least agree that the girl in the picture I posted has nothing in common with the girl in the AI generated picture?
The pic i posted (taken from Vhtv’s TG Channel)
The AI generated pic
4 Likes
I don’t play, John. I asked you a very simple, straightforward question, and as of this statement, you have yet to answer it.
You posted pics that have nothing to do with the picture I edited. I’ve seen every picture you posted. Of course, I know what she looks like. But the question I’ve asked you over and over has nothing to do with those pictures.
And the picture you posted that I edited shows the actual reality. Not all the extra pictures you’ve posted.
Finally, an answer, although not exactly correct. I clearly stated that the third picture was made without using AI. The second picture used AI to fix only the exposure. And that’s where my editing stopped.
It’s also incorrect because aside from the exposure, the three pictures are identical in every way. I used the first one, your original, and edited that one to get the second two.
So, those three pictures are the same pictures in every way, except for exposure. The one using AI is no different than your original. And I used the one edited with AI to generate all the other pictures. It’s the same face in every single picture, as in your original.
And as I’ve said repeatedly, the AI did not change her face. It’s the same face as the girl in your original photo, whoever she might be. The AI merely filled in the foreground and background around her face. Nothing more.
If I had to guess, I’d say that the girl in the original picture you posted (the one I edited) is not the same girl as the one in all the other pictures you’ve posted since then. Their faces in your originals are completely different.
I fully understand what you think is the problem, John. But that isn’t the problem, at all.
My cropped picture shows the exact same face as in your original. I did not generate anything except the foreground and background around her face. And the face in every picture is the same as the one in your original. It is precisely the same, nothing changed, except the exposure.
You keep talking about reality as if what you said is true, but the simple truth and reality is, the exposure-corrected picture is the exact same face, as in your original. You simply refuse to admit it.
That’s why I asked you to answer the question. But you found a way to weedle your way around the correct answer because you didn’t want to admit that all three pictures were identical. Anybody looking at those pictures can clearly see that the faces are the same in every way except exposure.
But, you chose to divert attention away from that fact by posting different pictures that showed possibly a different girl, as I said above. Comparing the face in the picture I edited with all the other pictures you’ve posted…they do not look like the same girl.
Absolutely not, for at least three reasons and probably more.
-
Her face in the picture I edited was not AI generated. It was AI edited. There is a vast difference.
-
All the pictures you’ve posted since the one I edited have nothing to do with the one I edited.
-
The face in the picture that was AI edited for exposure is the exact same face as in your original.
If you want to agree on something, we can agree on item three, since you conveniently maneuvered around answering my question, which by the way you still owe me an answer for. That’s what you refuse to admit, even what you refuse to talk about.
Here’s both your original picture, and my AI edited picture. Tell me how the faces are different, except for exposure.
If you can’t see your original picture very well, you can fix the exposure with your own app.
If we had a little better quality streams we wouldn’t even need to make them better. Hang an iPhone on the wall and it would be better.
4 Likes
Amen. 
…
1 Like
I want to see that iPhone which is cabable of streaming 24/7 without overheating and in long term damaging the sensor it has.
iPhones nowadays have nightvision mode as well? 
1 Like
Hello, the Vhtv site is bucking, as I always call it. So, the page is constantly reloading.
That’s a bit annoying.
Is it the same for others?
No matter in which flat or with which camera, the page freezes briefly, stops and reloads
I have already solved a ticket. Let’s see what happens.
1 Like
I experienced similar trouble in the forum a short while ago, but it’s normal again now. Can’t say if the main site was affected, too. But right now the main site runs smoothly for me.
This has been the case for me for more or less the last two days. Even a restart and a new login had no new effect.
Let’s wait and see what support tells me.