Cooking in special clothing for @jabbath1987
6 Likes
Do you know anything more about what was written regarding the storage of videos etc. if there are animals present! San got a call right before she seems, in anger to take down a camera, then offline. Getting hopeless for several Gella, Magnolia and more! 
I had not noticed that remark. Thx for the information.
Does that mean, when participants don’t want their activities to be stored in archive, all they have to do is leave the cat on the table?
Or will the realm encounter any “punishment” ??
And where is the difference between storing in archive and displaying to begin with.
I guess it’s not, because the pet can’t wave it’s rights.
I know, you transmitted what Ledian “said”, but it just popped up in me, so please don’t take it personal. 
Has there become a specific restriction on mentioning animals in posts? I have not noticed that before.
1 Like
That would be strange, let’s just take Flora’s flat …
or
1 Like
Look above at the link I posted. It was explained the rules and reason from VHtv!
It is this one I assume.
Just to let you know we were told a couple of weeks ago that moments can no longer be saved that involve pets or if they have been saved they will be deleted or not approved. So if it is locked away they it means the scenes can be saved. These are the new rules we were told about. This might be the new norm from now on with pets been locked away.
[/quote]
1 Like
Don’t shoot the messenger. Read what is written in the link! 
Vær så snill og ikke skyt ned denna derre budbringeren nå da. 
That’s some of what I’m wondering too. This goes on VHtv and not on realms in the first place. But we all know what happens if rules are given to the participants. It is somewhat the same with the socks on alcoholic drinks. Fines were given!
1 Like
That’s probably where the (new) rule about ■■■■■■■ comes from …
I already thought that a ■■■■ brand wanted to become a sponsor here and that everything except Budweiser or something similar had to be labelled …
VHTV was presented by Budweiser … the ■■■■ for voyeurists … 
1 Like
I guess for protection of pets, some realms shouldn’t have pets to begin with. JMO
5 Likes
I haven’t seen it, but maybe they have to “take their socks off” if they drink Bud!
1 Like
Will the pets directive be applicable to Henry??
1 Like