Yes, that is how it comes off. F___ed by a manager to draw interest for views. Like I said there is absolutely no sexual connection or energy between them. If there is as time goes on it will because they were told to or at best they know they have to earn x or else. This isn’t a person’s real life in the sense that it is their actual life, this is their work life as they maneuver through the demands of the job.
I think I’ve said enough for now. I’ll watch it play out from here and see if my inituition is correct or alas I’m proven wrong somehow. Sadly, it’s very clear to me that the tenants are reading this forum topic and although they claim that it’s not disrupting them, I can sense that it clearly is. They want a fan page not a forum topic.
Ce qui plaisait dans ce salon, c’était justement la complicité qui semblait régner entrer elle deux…Ca m’a fait notamment comprendre que deux lesbiennes pouvaient être heureuse !!! interférer une tiers personnes ne sera que préjudiciable a ce salon… Ce que je trouve regrettable aussi de la part de @montana c’est que pendant tout le spectacle ,elle était en train de regarder les commentaires sur son ordi!!!
That’s just it: they aren’t obligated to do anything. But many of them think they need to be naked 24/7, with their guests doing the same. Lost in there is any opportunity to connect with the participants.
Montana and Eva have always done their own thing. That’s what makes them unique on here and why I return to them (one of the reasons, anyway). And when they have included someone else, whether it was a girl or a guy guest, it was on their own terms.
I have not reviewed their contracts to know their obligations.
There is some logic involved. Participants are paid based on their viewership: more viewers leads to more money. It stands to reason that the participants would do what the viewers want to see. I don’t need a contract to reach that conclusion.
On est donc d’accord… que les participants ne font pas f___ement QUE ce qu’ils ont envie… mais SURTOUT ce qui risque de rapporter le plus sur des conseils de la maison mère…
Nobody ever said that management was involved or pressures anyone to do anything.
It simply stands to reason that the participants would give the viewers what they want to see. Such action is beneficial all the way around: for the participants and the site.
Just consider that Montana, Eva, and Dani have our attention. We want to see what happens next. That means they are doing something right.
Et qui selon vous a le plus d’intérêt ? La direction ou les participants qui reçoivent 50% des abonnements a se diviser en 40 appartements soit entre 120 et 150 personnes??
What you are saying is that it is a hustle. If I want to be hustled I’d watch Chaturbate. I know it’s an old battle over what is voyeurism, but still. It’s my opinion that yes we all know that the tenants are here to make money and they all have managers to keep happy. So, yes, there is to some extent a need to play a game with the viewers. But, in my view, because it’s voyeurism, the job of a voyeur tenant is to make it all seem real for the viewer. Repeating basic sex shows directly into the cams all day with constant breaks to lay on the couch and check the forum is not exactly trying to make it all seem real. It’s just Chaturbate with stationary cameras that run 24/7.
Sans parler du fait que j’ai une reçu une réponse a un de mes commentaires quelques minutes après l’avoir publie pendant leur “jeux”… preuve s’il en est qu’elle surveille ce qui se dit…
I stand behind my assertion of a few days ago: this is not a documentary.
I don’t see this as a hustle, though it is easy to arrive at that conclusion based on the actions of some apartments. At the end of the day it is still a job for the participants and a business for VHTV. If the viewers (or paid customers) aren’t there then VHTV ceases to exist.
And as VHTV allows more and more blatant hustling without any respect for the niche of voyeurism that they are conducting their business in, then the more porn addicts and camjohns they will gather and voyeurs get left behind, the more sex on command, the more chicken circus sideshows, they’ll get. This whole genre has already been damaged beyond all repair because of the greed of VHTV and it’s managers. The idea of fly on the wall voyeurism cannot exist anymore because of what they did. Oh sure, it may be a successful business, but the idea that it is voyeurism becomes pitiful joke.
