I know you don’t believe me but it has happen before just ask around
Different timelines, different opinions
Straight up and smiling ??
Broken man???
Death by firing squad if found guilty of spiking her _____. I keep replaying it because there is a sudden change in her disposition like the _____ is too strong, however, date r__e d__gs would not take effect instantly, and it needs time to get into the b___d system.
I did not see any effects in any clips from what I’ve seen personally when girls have been spiked, she still had too much energy.
Even if they made the _____ extra extra strong, it still needs time.
But this dodgy behavior from those dudes, that ain’t cute at all.
I was not there for 2 3 days and I see a girl got r__ed by 3 guys??
Can somebody tell me what happened?
The 3 guys put something in nayas _____ and took advantage of her by having sex with her, the 3 guys in the same time??
if it wasnt r__e why did you delete the footage? @VHTV_James
it is time now to let this r__e thing go. i didn’t see it and i don’t want to see it but i like Medea and Wayne. They are trying to have a fun, active apartment.
This isn’t the best logic because whether it’s r__e or if it’s regret if, someone doesn’t want footage to be up, it should be taken down
This is our standard workflow where we take away the incident(s) from the timeline for review and turn the apartment offline. In 99% of the cases, this workflow requires our team to delete the footage related, no matter if rules were broken or not.
In regards to the incident, our team did a thorough interview with all the participants. The results are as follows:
- Female guest involved in the incident confirmed she was not r__ed and acted with consent.
- She recognizes herself being _____. She recognizes herself provoking other guests for “sexual actions towards her” (not our words, guys)
- She told the apartment managers and our team she will be glad to return back again and asked apartment hosts to invite her again in the future.
The studio was fined by VHTV, despite we could not prove the incident as r__e. This is a precautionary measure as we find the incident inappropriate and would like studios to be get more responsible in regards to guests and controlled a_____l usage.
So why she said to Wayne she was r__ed?
I hope the guys are at least banned from returning back?
I have no idea, I can only forward what we got from the participants & guests themselves.
I don’t know for sure. Let’s see how responsible the studio is in regards to such disgusting actions.
Did you also investigate if the guys put something in her _____? @VHTV_James
Look at the video I provided in ticket #179224 with a person who understands Russian please.
No, I don’t think it’s our cup of tea. Sorry, no pun intended.
I do not understand. It is not right when they did that. And then it is for sure part of your business…
NEXT CASE!
We got no confirmation of such actions, that’s all I can say in regards to it.
There you go. A lot of talk, no action…
Can we see a transcript of the interviews, because all I see here is your words that no one can argue…
No, you can’t.
I’m sorry, but these are our internal communications with studios, participants and guests. This is a no business of any 3rd party.
You checked this video and also what they are saying?
Was this led by an (independent) woman?
There was once a case in a bathroom and at that time the CEO had promised that everything would be regulated anew and harsher penalties would be imposed. In addition, such conversations are carried out by female persons who have no financial interest in the possible outcome.