Luchik

[quote=“Sparkles, post:1644, topic:3480”]
As viewer, if i saw something (whatever it may be that looks “suspicious”) i send a ticket, then the rest isn’t up to me… they do and decide what they believe it’s right according to their policy.
If they saw nothing fine, if they see that as something to take care, great

You do that and what happens, they write to you and say it is being investigated and you never hear from them again. They hope you forget about it.

Hopefully they’re back online soon! There will always be the viewers who wants to act the knight in white shiny armor to women who neither asked for or is in the need of their defense. We’ve heard them calling wolf time and time again…

1 Like

As far as I know after 48 hours the footage no longer exist unless somebody requested an archive for it.

So if you see a woman being r__ed, you simply ignore it.

No I write about it in the comments on a porn site, like a true hero! :rofl:

No r__e was committed.

And that is your opinion which just like everybody else you have a right to. As to your original comment, well it did not add much to a rather serious discussion.

It sounds like you are someone who is familiar with this type of behaviour, such a hero! If this should happen to someone you love, you will probably tell them it was their own fault!

Back on line.

1 Like

I understand that Themis is not only blind, but also turned away in the other direction, since the Luchik is online

But i don’t expect they have to say anything about it

If something forbidden is reported and they check it, that part is automatically deleted from the timeline. It happened recently at crazy house that when the house come back online, the violence parts weren’t present.
And of course if something like that is request to be archive, it won’t be accepted

Such actions, I see, pass with impunity, and he can do something like this for the third time. sad :cry:

I have seen posts of D__g use, Violence and A___e. Each time the realm is taken offline. Most of the time the realm comes back online. It’s this easy, if you don’t like what you see stop subscribing. If the money dries up the site will go away.

1 Like

Never understood why people even report stuff like d__gs. You want realism, but only the Disney version of realism?

It probably not the d__g use in isolation that is the problem, it’s the violence and sexual a___e that follows as a result of the d__g use.

Do you mean that only the incidents related to violence and/or sexual a___e is reported? If that’s the case I don’t agree. There’s been a lot of cases where projects gotten taken offline because of d__gs, and nothing but d__gs. In fact the vast majority of the take downs falls under this category.

Or do you mean that violence and/or sexual a___e is a given reaction to d__gs? In which case I definitely don’t agree with you.

1 Like

image

Obviously not in every case, but we have seen it happen not so long ago in Lola & Otto’s apartment, when that apartment was taken off-line.

And also here on that days when luchik did that to Altera

Después de todo lo que sucedió lo mínimo que puede hacer luchik es tratar de ponernos felices y yo quiero que algún chico se coja a luchik o al revés. Eso me pondría feliz.

1 Like

Well I never understand why folk think it is acceptable to show this, after all with that logic it is realism for m____r, r__e kid fiddling or a number of other things.
And to answer your question I watch to see real people live life not commit crimes.

1 Like

The difference is that every single example you listed is done to others and hurts them in the moment, d__gs you do to yourself, and it hurt you over time if kept using.