The best evidence was when he lifted her hand and used it to touch his cock. The hand was totally relaxed and floppy. She was 100% not awake!
Yes. And he was “careful” to not wake her. That is why he switched to his hand when cumming
And Markus even dare to say that he was punished for what he did to Altera… Seems that law 131/132 could have been applied to him here
What i want to tell, that in our country, we don’t have many rules about it, all agreement happens before the acts, and i want to tell, that this girl tell to me, that it was all OK, and she don’t understand, why this situation is too difficult in Europe,
Why this girl ask her girlfriend to visit them, after this accident?
I would not have done a ticket when it would be the typical wake up actions between fuckbuddies or a couple when as___p to give BOTH of them pleasure.
But at that point he only used her (totally unaware because she was s___ping) for his own pleasure. He never was even close to her before or they made out or anything.
This is not okay. And that is why I made a ticket.
We don’t have rules about that
Your country doesn’t have laws against what he did to altera?? really? Against sex a___es on inanimate persons?
So if someone do the same that he did to Sunny you will be all laughs and smiles?
Закон охраняет право женщины на сексуальную неприкосновенность, не делая исключения даже и для супружеских пар, заведомое презюмирование сексуальных отношений между супругами как бы психологически препятствует женщине заявить об изнасиловании. И все преступления, квалифицируются исключительно, как преступления против здоровья личности,. Вот выдержка из обращения к адвокату по таким вот делам
It is always difficult to ask the victim as there can be several reasons for her not to say anything against him. This is often the case in that situation. So I think VHTV has the footage. They will watch and decide on that. We do not need anything more as the video leaves no doubts.
yes everything is there, I gave him links where everything is popularly explained
I seem to remember having this sort of discussion on another apartment topic (Katia) and the difference of opinions. As far as I am concerned having sex with a person who is not able to say no for whatever reason be it _____, d__gs or s___ping is r__e. A person has to give consent or be coherent as to what is happening to them. I have not seen the video of what he did to Altera so will not comment.
I will say this though. VHTV have a strict policy about violence and d__gs etc. They will not tolerate it. On that policy I call utter BS. Far too often we have seen violent behaviour from tenants or guests and someone writes a ticket. What happens, the place goes offline for a while only to be back online with the same tenants and guests. The explanation given is that the relevant managers have spoken to them and it will not occur again.
Since when did VHTV or their managers become the law and decide what can be done. There are relevant authorities that need to deal with these situation. My reasoning and of course I could be wrong is that VHTV do not want the legal hassle of reporting such actions as they would come under scrutiny. So what they do is say they will look into it, delay it and the timeline evidence disappears after 48 hours. They hope the viewers forget about it and just carry on as nothing has happened. The victim in these cases are probably very scared or have no idea on what they should do. Hey but what do I know.
1 Like
hello everyone, makrus read and watched until the end of the video, he understood everything.But the ray said that this girl was previously in agreement with the ray .In short, we are waiting for an answer from them.From Sunny
Well, I’m just now reading what happened here.
I’ve commented on situations in the past, and I’ve been criticized by everyone.
Now the same has happened, with other words and protagonists, and the theme was debated normally as it should be, finally it is only an observation, which should not interest anyone, but which I feel the need to do it.
I hope Luchik will come back 
So is this place offline, not even showing as offline. What are we going to have here, another internal investigation? The manager is going to have a stern talking to Luchik? What qualifications does the manager have to sort this out. Firstly, there is the obvious bias as they are friends. Who represents the girl? This site has got fairly big, and these situations need to be handled in a professional manner. No wonder you do not see apartments in Europe as the laws would be a real issue and not like where they are, simply a hassle. We the viewers certainly have no recourse other than opening a ticket to support.
About this one i have no idea, don’t even remember watching her before…
About the other situation of a___e, the person that represent the Luchik himself is exactly the same that represent girl that was at time/is starting her career on the agency that represent these houses. The result is what we know
And that is the huge issue. How can one person represent both parties? And as previously stated what qualifications does the manager have to deal with such issues?
Well i guess it’s not only what manager says that is valid. They have the images and are things that you can’t say that is black when it’s white.
But surely that situation didn’t end in a fair way, specially for the victim.
As viewer, if i saw something (whatever it may be that looks “suspicious”) i send a ticket, then the rest isn’t up to me… they do and decide what they believe it’s right according to their policy.
If they saw nothing fine, if they see that as something to take care, great
And that places then a pass them to the “negative” side to avoid keep contributing for their income
The reality is that a million viewers will now click to see the footage and the income goes up. Yes they have taken it offline so we can’t do that but when they come back everybody will view it to see what has changed. As they say about advertising, there is no bad publicity.
Unless they remove the footage of course, which I’m sure they have done so in the past.