I think it would be a good idea to offer different subscription prices based on the number of apartments included. For example, a subscription for 5 apartments + archive videos at a certain price, and a subscription for 10 apartments + archive videos at a different price. This approach could help in several ways:
More Variety of Apartments: Currently, I personally think there is a huge lack of variety. The majority of the new apartments are quite similar and feature the same group of people. Offering more specific subscription options could showcase apartments that contribute more value to subscribers, while highlighting those that offer less.
Attract More Subscribers: Lower subscription costs for smaller packages could make it more affordable for a wider audience, ultimately increasing the number of subscribers.
somebody as found the competitors add-on site , personally speaking i think it is just a gimmick and wont take off ,VHTV is great value , it cost less than $1 dollar a day for full access to everything on this site. , if you have to worry about watching what you spend a dollar a day on then perhaps you shouldnt subscribe at all , just my opinion ,dont get all arsey at me
I have the opposite opinion, I think it’s a great idea, why pay for apartments you don’t watch or have no interest in, I’m sure most people only watch an handful of apartments
I understand what your saying , but remember activities vary from day to day in different appartments sometimes there hot and sometimes there shite ,sometimes you get surprise guest and all that effort to swap your subscription from one set to another just to chase the action , thats ok for those that spend 24/7 on here . i think if anything should change it should be the amount of replay on the timeline , increase that to 7 days and i think everyone will be happy with the overall cost
That is extremely flawed. What if I initially subscribed because of a specific apartment, and then one day, I forgot to log out, leaving the page open on an apartment I don’t watch as much? Does that mean the apartment could get paid more just because I forgot to log out or leave the page? Also, I don’t see how that system makes sense. Once you’ve subscribed, whether you watch the apartment more or less doesn’t matter, you don’t pay more.
It s 39.95$ for 1 month premium subscription.
Also, I think it’s important to be open-minded. Not everyone has the same financial situation, mentality, or way of spending money. The idea is that the more options you give viewers, the more potential viewers you can attract.
This is not (only) about the money we pay. It is about where the money go as well. In fact, i would go even further and split the site/apartments into categories : Pure voyeur ones and porn/sex circus ones. Then let the participants to decide in which category they want to go. This will also make it clear for everyone what kind/type of action apartment they get to watch. Having them all together in one place is so misleading and unfair. One of the main reasons so many good apartments are closing fast ( compared with the “other” site where even now there are so many normal couple participants from years ago, here they have almost zero chances to compete with the “porn” apartments and managers)
realistically speaking . Do you think the site owners are going to implement any of those options mentioned , when they cant even do a site update without continuos errors , if they tried adding extra options ,we would probably end up clicking one of the options and end up watching chinese pingpong on the darkweb
I mean, at some point, they have to take initiative and put in the work if they want to keep their subscribers or attract new ones. Personally, I’ve been a huge fan of this site and have been advocating for it on other platforms, but now my current subscription is soon ending, and I’m not sure I want to resubscribe with the current content. I know there are ups and downs, but it doesn’t seem like any real actions are being taken to make changes. The content is becoming very repetitive and boring. New apartments open, but they offer nothing new, just the same copycat content as 40 other apartments. I often try to understand how most of the new apartments attract or retain viewers.
How does it not work that way? You pay a subscription, VHTV takes it’s cut then the rest goes towards apartments you view. Seems straight forward to me.
Well the simple answer is yes the stats would show you watching that apartment and they will get a portion of the subscription what you already paid for.
Now I’m fairly certain the system will be a little bit more complicated than this, but basically you buy a subscription (remember you pay the same sub for 10 active apartments or 50 active apartments) VHTV takes its cut and the rest is used for the apartments you visit.
i know mate . your right in what your saying “partly” ,just having a laugh , but your asking for the impossible ,they need to learn how to keep the site they have running without continuos errors before they go adding to it , ican just imagine the pandomomium it will cause if they tried adding extra options at the present time
It’s very flawed. It would make sense if viewers’ subscriptions were charged per minute or hour watched, but since it’s a one-time payment, I don’t see the logic behind it. I mean, it also kind of explains why there are so many copycat apartments and a lack of variety. With that system, I don’t see how you could tell which of your apartments attracted new viewers.
The answer is quite simple: all of those copycat apartments belong to the same managers. The more they open, the bigger share from the big pot of money they get. What happens after that, it is a totally different story and they 100% don’t give a flying fuck. The “participants” are totally irrelevant, they get moved and changed whatever the managers interests are
that is something we can pretty much agree on that will never happen