1 Like
I would guess that since so many apartments seem to be alike then that is what people are probably watching.
The simple answer is as a viewer it is none of our business what apartments attract new viewers, that will be held by VHTV and they will review the stats and share it with the managers & participants.
1 Like
Except I doubt VHTV actually know what specific apartments I watch, the apartments get paid on overall views and not if I watch a specific apartment or not
2 Likes
I donât watch not even half of the apartment here
3 Likes
you might be surprised to know what data they know and keep from your account , 
1 Like
There could be other explanations, such as it taking more effort for the managers to find different types of participants, or they might want to give certain apartments to friends, etc. Again, I donât think tracking how much someone watches an apartment is a good system since the subscription is a one-time payment. I could watch 100 hours of apartments in one month and still choose not to subscribe the next.
A more complex answer would be that it is our business if we are not happy with the content. That is the purpose of feedback. As a viewer, Iâm not satisfied with the current content due to a lack of variety. Iâm offering a possible explanation for this and a potential solution. They can choose to do what they want with it, but it is our business because we pay for the content and want to know if itâs worth continuing to pay for.
after 8 years and zero viewer imput implemented , think its safe to say your flogginga dead horse if you think they will change there ways on the whim of 1 or 2 viewers , over 90% of the viewers dont communicate with them they just accept things the way they are ,
3 Likes
Well, iâm sorry to tell you, but we do not pay a single cent for the content. There are other sites where this is happening. We only pay to have access to the cams + archive, the content is totally at the participants free will/discretion. And this is one very good thing that shouldnât be changed
1 Like
fuk me sideways ,for once a comment from you that actually makes sense 
3 Likes
I even surprised myself 
1 Like
Even if they did know I doubt they will be saying oh that user Shyguy watched Joanna apartment for 15 mins and Lisbet for 5 mins , we better remember to take that out of his subscription money to give to those specific apartments
1 Like
So youâre telling me that your decision to pay for a subscription isnât influenced by whatâs shown on those cams? If they were showing people reading books in libraries, would you still pay for the subscription?
Then what is the purpose of the feedback and ideas section of the forum?
its something/option every forum thats linked to another site as , its a way of making members believe they have materilistic imput into the improvement of the main site when in reality they dont ,every so often a member comes up with an idea that is then taken and minipulated by the website developer to use as there own . ie , like your suggestion here, not saying that will happen , as you never know but if history and knowledge of the main site is anything is to go by , then i wouldnt be holding out much hope, as i have previously stated the forum members are only a tiny proportion of the main site members/viewers and unless your idea would greatly increase membership /financies then there is next to no hope of them even considering it ,
2 Likes
Hereâs a scenario to illustrate the major problem with paying participants based on minutes watched:
Member 1 browses the site and decides to subscribe because heâs interested in watching apartment AAA. He pays for the entire subscription on Day 1 of the month.
Throughout the month, he watches apartment AAA for a total of 60 minutes on two occasions. He is satisfied with that, and thinks itâs worth subscribing for another month. So, he decides to subscribe for another month.
During the same month, while browsing the site multiple times, he watches apartment FFF for a total of 180 minutes, but heâs not satisfied with the content, as itâs a large group of people teasing without leading to anything.
From what I understand, in this scenario, apartment FFF receives three times more money than apartment AAA from Member 1, even though Member 1 only subscribed and renewed for AAA.
In Month 2, midway through the month, the participants in apartment AAA decide to leave due to low revenue. Apartment AAA is replaced by apartment BBB, which is very similar to FFF in terms of content, as it attracts more viewers. However, Member 1 is not satisfied and decides to leave the site entirely.
I hope this illustrates the clear problem with this system. It explains why many cams engage in those pre-planned group teasings that ultimately lead to nothing. Itâs not rocket science, apartments get more viewers when there are a lot of people, but that doesnât mean they attract new subscribers or retain the existing ones.
you have a good argument but sorry to say your wasting your time , the most your going to get out of it is the original reply from your 1st comment ,
3 Likes
I hope not, but you are probably right unfortunately 
1 Like
hey but thanx for an intresting hour in this discussion , enjoy the rest of your day 
1 Like
Off course it is influenced by whatâs shown on the cams. It can not be different. What iâm saying is that we do not have the right to influence whatâs shown on the cams ( as we do not pay directly the participants for it). There are many other sites for something like that ( i.e webcamming sites). Here, we can only watch (subscribe) or not. It is quite simple
I understand what youâre saying, but itâs not related to what I was saying. All subscribers influence at a certain extend whatâs shown on the cams. Going back to the library example: if all the apartments turned into library voyeur content, many wouldnât subscribe the following month. VHTV, managers and participants wouldnât make money. They would go back to the old format. Subscribers would have influenced whatâs shown in that case.