About saving moments. Odds and ends

Why don’t these images appear in Archive Moments?, does anyone have them?

No-one requested it to be archived.

Then I request the archiving, what is the procedure?

If you want to request something saving to the archives, then just post in the Archive Video Requests part of the forum.

Try to give as much details as you know - date & time, which apartment & which room. Also, things can only be saved within 48 hours of them happening.

Ok thanks for the explanation, I didn’t know how to proceed, unfortunately I didn’t get the information from the video, I base myself on the information that the user ed2 shared, I will have to ask him some data

The date is actually cropped off the picture so we don’t know if it happened recently or 6 months ago. I checked the timeline at the time 18:45 over the last 2 days and it was just an empty room, so it must be more than 2 days old which means it can no longer be saved.

Once again thank you for the explanation, I also noticed that the date does not appear on the image, I was going to ask the user the date of the image, so if I understood correctly, it can only be saved in the archives if it happened within 48, hours, am I correct or wrong?

Yes that’s correct. I checked 18:45 on 4th September and also 18:45 on 3rd September and it was an empty room, so it must have happened longer than 48 hours ago so cannot be saved anymore.

I appreciate the information and support, well I will have to hope Sabrina provides us with this kind of good footage again, Sabrina has been moving up the scale for me.

It was on the timeline when I posted the picture. Probably on the 2nd then. But it was nothing to see, really. We just have to wait til she masturbates next time. Hopefully in a different room. :crossed_fingers:t3:

I thought you guys were supposed to archive interesting moments, PLUS what is requested. I’m fairly sure that’s the way it used to work. If that’s not the case, why have so many of you? Just a curiosity question.

That’s correct. So, if this moment is not saved - then nobody from operators was interested in it and it also was not requested by anyone else.

Another nuance is operators are usually searching for action manually on the timeline, so scene may be just missed if nobody notices it (f.e. because of low activity on timeline)

Well lately this place has no action at all :upside_down_face:

I get missing things on the timeline. That’s understandable, especially with there being such little control over it. Basically, it’s hit or miss, at least on the user’s timeline.

What I don’t understand is operators not being interested enough to archive something. I would think the operators are there to save everything that may be interesting to other people and not just themselves. After all, the archive is not just for the operators, it’s for all the members.

I would say, at the very least, anything of a sexual nature should be saved automatically, requested or not, and regardless if the operator is interested in it personally. There’s always someone else who will be interested.

I don’t get where the problem is? As ed wrote above there was nothing really to see. So how are we supposed to see it? :thinking:

Unfortunately cam angles are not good and also hiding in weird angles is the only thing this place stands for lately…

1 Like

Jabba, clearly I was not talking specifically about that particular incident. I was speaking about the overall, general job of the operators. Kaya understood that and answered accordingly. Even my first comment to Stanley was clearly not about the “Ed moment”. :confused:

Okay in general we check the timeline of any peaks and also often talk with our fellow operator mates which things we save and how we do it. I’d say we capture about 95% of all stuff happening on timeline. Plus the stuff which got requested I dare say we are very close to 100% of everything.

But to see something we have to see peaks in timelines so we click on it and check. Also an automatic system would need something like that.

Getting back to that particular case here as I saw on Eds photo it happened in the dark and you basically could not see anything as her pants also blocked the views I guess there simply was no peak in the timeline as not enough viewers recognized it.

Peaks on timeline are created on views at that particular moment. As I can see clearly see also on comments to that place people are losing interest in it and so there might be simply not much viewers to create that peak in the timeline.

That is not the fault of us operators it is just how the system works. You can blame that place for being a snoozathon for weeks now :upside_down_face:

1 Like

Oh, Jabba, Jabba, Jabba, what am I going to do with you, pal. :slightly_smiling_face: Let me try and cover all the bases, here.

I wasn’t faulting you or any other operator for anything, not one single thing.

You’re defending something that 1) doesn’t need to be defended and 2) I wasn’t talking about in the first place. Go back and read Kaya’s reply to my post to Stanley. What she said made it sound like, if there was something that was not interesting to an operator AND there was no request for it, then it wouldn’t get archived. THAT’S what I was speaking to, not what you or any operator actually does or gets done.

I’m sure, with as many operators as there are, you probably do capture most everything, but that had nothing to do with my conversation with Kaya.

You’re still going on about Ed’s specific moment. Nowhere, in any post did I mention, refer to or even imply anything about that specific moment. I was simply never concerned with it, at all.

When I said “automatically”, I was referring to anything an operator might automatically save on their own, not what an automated system might do.

Great! Now I have a moment named after me. The Ed moment!

I totally understood what you meant. I was just saying how it works in general.

1 Like