forgot about this yesterday:
if it’s not to late to make a suggestion: i would raise my fist and call him Mephistopheles
It’s actually THREE dogs and no man. I think that is why @jabbath1987 put it here.
Yes exactly. But first look can be deceiving.
Yes, It’s a very clever picture and even I had to look carefully to work it out. The tail of the extra dog kind of gave it away, for me though.
It’s basically thought to have been a MUCH MUCH larger version of the Great White Shark. Scary stuff, especially if you were swimming and encountered one!
But it was more like a very big bull shark than a white shark. The shape was a lot different from a white shark.
Well, look at the shape (and size) of each. Pictures 1 and 3 (Megladon and Great White respectively) demonstrate the point. Picture 2 of the Bull Shark shows the more bullish (hence the name) head.
Not everyone can draw three different portraits with this tool
Georgian artist and social media star Eduard Tsokoloyan can not only draw portraits of three people at once, but also cut out the face of any person from an ordinary sheet of paper.
I’d say second looks can also be deceiving because there is no way that’s not a person wearing a beanie, a coat and pants. You can even see the length of the coat if you look between his knees.
He’s either carrying what I think is a wolf, but could be a dog, over his left shoulder, or he’s wearing a wolf hide around both shoulders.
I had to overexpose it to even see the eyes and nose. The head hangs at an angle just below the person’s head.
I think it’s a wolf hide. Enlarge this picture and look just below the person’s head. You’ll see the eyes and nose. The head points down and to the left.
The whole figure is a dog.
He stands towards the camera and looks to the left edge of the picture.
The alleged man’s “head” is the dog’s tail.
It is probably a poodle.
I don’t understand how a dog’s tail could be right behind his head, when his hind legs are on the ground. And, that’s assuming the whole figure is a dog , which doesn’t seem plausible, at all.
How do you explain the length of the coat? Look between his knees. Clearly, that’s a coat.
You don’t see the dog’s back legs, only the front legs.
What you call the “coat” is the dog’s chest and from the angle of the shot it appears as if the tail is directly behind the head.
The whole thing is just an optical illusion, which is ultimately the point of this photo.
When you said optical illusion, it popped into view, but only for a second, then the “person” came back into view.
Correct on ALL counts.
Angular perspective…something which photo editors such as myself MUST take into account when compositing images, to make the final image look right.
That’s simply the dog’s own ‘coat’ (its hair / fur) showing against a rather flat (from this angle) contour of its chest.
How do you even start to explain what has happened in the world the last 5 years