well said john78
1 Like
no get rid of the manager have vhtv fedx or DHL the cameras to which ever town or city the new apartment is in hire a local electrician he picks up the cams etc goes to the apt sets them up bish bash bosh job done no manager required this has the added advantage of not having managers buying cheap s__t cameras
1 Like
Bish Bash Bosh
1 Like
what??? are you serious??? can you extend te story about Fox and penalties ? is it true about the groceries? and how sure are you?
if thats true than @VHTV_James shall take fucking serious actions!!
1 Like
John the main and bigest reason manager existing for vhtv is for legal reasons.
now what ever everyone says comes secondary.whaever happens it ends up vhtv is just a platform and doesnt keep accountabily for anything.thats the most importnat reason for managers.
and thats creating s__t lots of problems,vhtv takes control of managers than creates a conection between them two thus can be used against vhtv. and after this managers do whatever they want. solve the legal problem than you dont need managers.
1 Like
I know and i am afraid that nothing will ever change. It’s working perfectly for both Vhtv and the managers the way it is now.
Its not working perfectly if subscribers favourites are leaving because of bad management . There is one fundimental rule of business that is universal The Customer is King you never piss your paying customers
1 Like
I have to carefully state that it is not always that golden business rule is followed up correctly. Hopefully it is not an exaggeration. 
1 Like
if the golden and most important rule of business is not being followed then management gets fired . In any commercial enterprise the senior management s__ts on lower management hence the term (The s__t flows downhill) it has always been that way .The one thing you never do is k__l the goose that lays the golden eggs 
1 Like
I think I prefer your walrus gif response to him better. 
1 Like
compare the number of subscribers to the number of members of the forum complaining . i doubt it would look like there was a problem , but more like a select few showing contempt . i better add im one of the complainers , my comment was to highlight if in fact there is a problem looking at the percentages
1 Like
I can translate your very last element to norwegian for you. The one thing you never do is k__l the goose that lays the golden eggs. Just to have a little fun. In norwegian that is as follows: Den ene tingen du aldri gjør er å drepe den gåsa som legger alle gull eggene.
2 Likes
How about u look at deez 
’s ??
1 Like
I prefer goose over eggs tbh. 
🪿 
1 Like
dont start on me , im speaking about facts and figures , unless you can disprove them , move along and take your chidish puns with you
1 Like
I doubt the number of subscribers v forum members makes any difference we all view the same content or lack of content its a numbers game is it worth paying for is the only real question ???
1 Like
well considering people must be still paying for subscription in there thousands and there must be an increase in revenue or at least a stable income to keep the appartments going . compare that against the number of unhappy members in this forum
2 Likes
Very well, I’ll leave things back to the grandpas and their immense wisdom on how things on the internet should be run.
1 Like
I can fully understand that point actually.
1 Like
only time will tell on that one
1 Like