Exactly as I said there were severe cases of violence when places got closed immediately. I know of at least two cases. I won’t say what happened there as this might become ugly… It is good they are gone…
These things happen in a spur of the moment. Cams on or off doesn’t matter. They have tunnel vision and clearly the a___er is no longer concerned with the cams. Leaving them on will only increase the audience and further humiliate the victim.
Jesus Chris, you scared me here for a moment.
I nevrr though of anything like this here, so I was so shocked by the violence of the last few days…
Again, you have to leave the discretion up to vhtv and not be concerned about it. The bdsm on vhtv is usually pretty obvious and light.
I never wrote anything about real m____r…
Well if I hit a guy at work I would get fired, plain and simple. Not be a good boy and don’t do it again. If you are serious about it then simply SHUT the place down. Does it seem harsh especially to the victim, yes but they know what they are getting into. Viewers, well the majority have no wish to see domestic violence. Stop with this fine and warning, it is not working. Violence should be immediate closure with no warning. That is my opinion but ultimately my views do not become policy as that is your job. I am tired of having this discussion on something as vile as domestic violence. I would rather talk about all the good things I enjoy on VHTV.
@VHTV_CEO thank you for these information.
Again an opinion which you are entitled to but I disagree with you. No actual violence in his case but BDSM is violence albeit between consenting adults.
I am not a friend of violence, and certainly not against women.
Yesterday I tried to explain something about the attitude of the Russians and the methods of education.
In the West, one would say that the “beating up” of opinions is not uncommon.
Believe me, it works very well. If you’ve been watching us since the beginning, you should know that there have been many more cases of violence, and what we’ve come to now is precisely because of punishments for such actions. It happens much less often than it used to, I have statistics.
Of course I leave it up to VHTV, it is their company and the tenants their responsibility. Other than an opinion what do you expect viewers to do?
I think this is a bit too easy thinking. As I said before and also CEO stated in severe cases kick out is the only solution. I know of at least two cases.
In less severe cases I think the method of the “three strikes” is okay. Why? Because tenants can see their error and when they stay long enough on the site even learn something for life and change their ways and views on that matter.
When they do not learn kickout is only a matter of time.
I do not have any but I feel same way. And it mainly happens when a place is new. Most people learn it after first occurence…
I understood that this had happened. I’ve never heard of any staged m____r, so I did understand wrong.
Pfuuu, I breathed a sigh of relief 
So basically violence is OK as long as it is in small doses.
Where did I say that? 
When it was okay there won’t be a fine and ultimately kick out when repeated…
I have a different opinion, no matter the level of violence, shut it down. Violence is simply unacceptable. Stop making any excuses for it. Whether it be a slap or a punch, it is violence and should not be tolerated.
Well the world is not only black and white. Never works this ways with mostly anything.
Nothing beyond reporting it, leaving it up to vhtv to handle, and moving on. The main point I want to make is this, the viewer doesn’t have all the facts. Vhtv and the manager may not either, but at least they are in a position to get them and then make a decision that hopefully is the best one given the circumstances at hand. This flying off the wall demanding immediately expulsion is narrow-minded and short-sighted. You’re in no position to know what’s really going on or at stake. Like the CEO said, vhtv has a much greater vested interest then all of the viewers combined.
Imagine if NASA engineers were incorrect with their calculations when sending a rocket to the moon and missed the moon. The scientist who was only a few kms out should not be fired as it was only a slight error but the guy who was 1 000kms out should be fired because he was way off. 