VHTV vs. RLC

Ich habe mir RLC für drei Monate geholt . Es ist im Prinzip genau so ich sag mal langweilig wie hier . Hin und wieder mal was zu sehen meistens auch die selben Leute .

Aber so viele Ausfälle aus diversen Gründen wie hier gibt es nicht . Die haben auch einige gute Funktionen .

Im Großen und Ganzen reicht ein Account hier oder beim RLC.

Wenn wir den heutigen Stand nehmen geht meine Tendenz für RLC.

Ich bin froh wenn mein Abonnent hier vorbei ist , die Seite hier ist rein technisch ein totaler Desaster geworden hinzu dass es zu 80% langweilig ist wird daraus 100%

The little time period I had my subscription at RLC, Then I relatively quickly decided to end it after one and a half week or so. Have never been into RLC ever again since that. Have no plans to return again either. Just the way it is. It is possible that it is boring at VHTV, but it was even more boring at RLC. Put up against the actual time period I was there. :fire: :heart_eyes:

1 Like

Ja wie gesagt , im Endeffekt beide gleich … beide haben ihre vor und Nachteile

2 Likes

I liked rlc cameras there were awesome but they lack content and participant are not that sexually active as at vhtv. Yes also boring because of above reason but I wish vhtv had cameras like them where faces and view are clear. It seems like we are just sitting beside them at RLC. vhtv camera guy should take it as our audience feedback on the cameras. Vhtv will rock if they have this camera upgrade.

1 Like

Look how much more cameras VHTV has. Would cost them a fortune. Maybe using better ones in newly opened places and then gradually replacing them. It is up to each manager if they invest a lot of money and buy new cameras.

1 Like

Yes I understand how the business works but slowly replacing would be better I think there will be a lot more views. You can increase prices people will pay for good content and clarity.

1 Like

love the content at vhtv shows like lisbet roza fennec etc.

1 Like

I would say in all hinsight looking back from what I remember vaguely. RLC had alright facilities and the layout was pretty ok. But their overall content was way below par. They had from what I remember a minimum amount of cameras. And their archive was way less extensive in clean size compared to vhtv. VHTV archive is way more extensively built up compared to RLC. Sort of a sad but absolutely true fact. VHTV archive is way bigger and better. And another thing was that the basic viewing of the content was very unclear. I experienced it as being very blurry. At RLC. :heart: Plus that it actually took an even longer amount of time from when I initiated my viewing time until something interesting happened. In my view. At RLC. Sorry for being so bluntly honest. You get a straight forward answer. :hugs:

correct me if im wrong , but i was always lead to believe that RLC provided the cameras on there site whereas on VHTV its left upto the managers to supply and fit there cameras out of there own pocket , which explains the price difference between the 2 sites , personally i find RLC to be biased towards models etc and less towards natural lifestyles , yes VHTV do that aswell but tend to offer more reallife than RLC , without being nasty but do you think tennants like Marla , jutta ,sophia and claudia etc would get a look in over on RLC , which always make me laugh when read the sites name , reallife my arse :crazy_face:

5 Likes

Lol, you must have had some serious strong stuff today :crazy_face: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The reality is totally, but totally the opposite… :wink:

1 Like

your reply was expected :crazy_face:, i could get into a great debate about who is right and who is wrong , but history shows that a debate can only seriously be undertaken if all parties have some facts that can be held as true , but sad to say your rose tinted glasses are very misty thus obstucting the chance of a debate that can come to a coclusion that all parties can agree upon :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:so let me take this oppotunity in giving you some well needed advice, go give your head a wobble , shake out some of those cobwebs and if you do that and prove that there is just the slightest bit of common sense hiding somewhere inside that warped head of yours ,then please do come back at me and we will carry on the debate :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

3 Likes

The answer is very simple. On RLC there are couples for years without the need to do shitty porn shows for views and after that leaving. Everything is way more stable. Even on the B apartments (vacation ones), there are singles and couples who come and stay for long time. One of main reasons for that is the absence of the greedy managers from here and the pressure they put on the participants to “perform”.

So, if you’re after “fake shows”, Vhtv is the place for you. If you want “Real life”, without doubts, RLC is the place to go

3 Likes

mmmmmhhhhh ???
tenor (2)
NOPE ! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

2 Likes

I don’t think it’s exactly like that either, there is a little bit of everything, the shows organized by the four or five Russian “models” who are locked up in an apartment have never seemed very real to me :roll_eyes:

Off course that there are some “shows” on RLC as well, especially on the “B” apartments (that’s where the models are). Same like there is some real life here on Vhtv. But all in all, there are much less “shows” there compared to here.

1 Like

What is b apartments? I have rlc membership but did not find it

B apartments are the vacation ones

1 Like
2 Likes

Sogar die Orte werden veröffentlicht…

1 Like

Basically, apartments with usually Russian or Ukrainian girls who are transferred to Barcelona for a few weeks and who are placed in a luxury apartment with the only condition that they walk around in their underwear, invite their “boyfriends” to maintain sexual relations and organize “light” lesbian shows.

5 Likes