Let them prepare a program for the future and give us a date. ![]()
special occasion party Special party for special days (14 February)
![]()
Did anyone notice some smileys are missing from reaction button⌠likeâŚ
I hope @VHTV_James add more reaction optionsâŚ
Fire emoji came instead of Hug. Thereâs an option to replace current set of emojis to any emojis you can select yourself. I donât like this idea because of how dirtier message feed would become. Or I am wrong and it wonât mess it up that bad. We can try.
There are 10 Emojis available to choose by anyone:
I made this set to cover basic emotions one can react to others here. I donât feel like more would make it better. So we either keep a limited amount of emojis to select, or we make it possible to react with any emoji you like.
I miss the hug emoji, I used to use that a lot. Can it be brought back and replace one of the more negative ones?
Wouldnât miss the silly facepalm one tbh, it seems to cause more controversy than anything else ![]()
Ever noticed when you want to replay a certain action it nearly always occurs at the end of the minute spacing than at the begining or even the middle ![]()
What emoji do you suggest to be kicked out?
I would suggest
angry. We need more hugging and less anger.
The facepalm one,seems to stir up more trouble than itâs worth.
I second that. Angry should go. It is basically never used.
Well that settles it, what Jabs says goes no doubt ![]()
Hey Jabba. I just found this topic, and Iâve only read a few posts, but I donât think I can agree with this. The reason is, I just loaded up 48 tabs, one RLC topic per tab, at the same time, and they all loaded up completely in about 10-15 seconds. CC doesnât seem to have any slow-loading problems to me.
I think all the emojis should stay as they are. While I agree with you, @stanley, we do need more hugs, than anger, but people run the gamut of emotions and should be allowed to express them, when they feel the need. JM2¢.
I only agree with these two, and categorically disagree with the others. JMO.
And you realize you are answering to a post being more than a year old? ![]()
Well, I did say I only just found this topic, but I donât believe thatâs true, either. The first post in this topic, as well as your post I quoted, have a date of Jul 21. If it were a year ago, it would also include the year in the date, but, this forum wasnât operational last July 21st.
It was just not for the public
As I scroll down through the posts, I see posts from Aug., Sept., Oct., etc. That being the case, why wouldnât the Jul. and Aug. posts contain last yearâs date, 2021? That might be a mite confusing, now that the forum is more than a year old.
I also see Amy was a big part of this topic, as well. Interesting.
