Why do you want to identify people by a name when the most of them make only pass and your interest is only summed up in the potential fuck. Aren’t their image and performance not enough to you ? Maybe want to keep a register ? 
Take a step back, it’s only voyeurism, not the beginning of a relationship.
3 Likes
I would much rather them have names instead of “guest guy” or “that guy”. I think most subscribers would like to identify the guests.
2 Likes
Why do you need to identify the guests when they only come once (maybe twice) and never see them again ?
1 Like
You don’t know how often they will visit. A lot of guests with names became regulars or even participants later.
4 Likes
That’s exactly why it does make all the sense to get names if and only they become participants. I fully agree with you here
1 Like
Well let’s agree to disagree
2 Likes
Some people just want to argue. They spout nonsense because they want attention
2 Likes
I can give you one recent example, why did that guy Dancer get a name ? What for ? If you check the archive, there is absolutely nothing. Zero…
I belive Ariella suggested it
And ??
10 Characters …
I personally prefer to talk about him and use a name instead of writing ‘the guy with the weird arm’.
Here in the forum everyone has a name too. If I had to address everyone concerned as ‘the guy who always writes nonsense’ too many people would have to feel addressed on a regular basis
and btw: he is already in the archive several times… but always only as ‘guest guy’. so much for ‘absolute zero’ …
2 Likes
Why do you need to say: ‘the guy with the weird arm’, when you can easily call him a guest or Ariela’s guest ?
It is totally irrelevant to have a name as long as he’s only another one from the thousands of guests that we seen passing thru the Vhtv experience. IMO
I think John78 is referring to the time when Jabb always asked if a visitor deserved a name. If it was just a visit, no name was given even if requested, as “not deserved”.
Apparently this has now changed. At least, I think that is the core of his questioning.
I could be wrong tho.
4 Likes
because unfortunately this is just as useful for distinguishing as:
sometimes the selection is simply too large to be specific enough
No, you’re not wrong. It was exactly my point.
1 Like
That’s exactly my point, why does he need to be distinguished for ? There is absolutely nothing with him in the archive. The same as thousands of other guests who have spent some time in front of the cams, he is totally irrelevant.
I am sure he would be totally charmed and very happy to read that! 
go clean your glasses
he could have had a name earlier. And it is unfortunately well known that the archive does not allow any subsequent additions of names
2 Likes
Exactly. We don’t have any influence on what names other operators use.
3 Likes
David, i only meant that he’s irrelevant from Vhtv’s point of view and definitely not him as a person.
1 Like