You seem to be someone who likes to hear themselves talk without having been asked.
Since everything has already been said, there’s no need to discuss it further just to clutter this topic up even more.
This is a valid point. I concede tbh.
2 Likes
Fortunately, the wishes of these few trolls were not granted.
1 Like
well should have said its more then good ITS GREAT
Perhaps the biggest threat to the project is the insufficient number of active attractive youngsters sufficiently motivated to provide interesting entertainment.
But as said by Lazarus. it aint going to change.
4 Likes
Not many not attractive people on the project. So I do not get what you mean?
If recall a previous post quite some time ago another member stating that other similar sites are experiencing the same problems regarding recruiting suitable participants.
The thing is just to not put quantity over quality. Lately a lot of apartments closed which is a good thing when the dead wood is being cut. And I am sure there will be more to follow. So the good and healthy ones have the space they need and get the attention they deserve.
3 Likes
That is a very point to make Jabbath. Sometimes the members don’t understand the pressures that the participants are under being on cam 24/7. Who are trying to be entertaining as well. Cheers
1 Like
Some of them would have a lot less pressure if some managers would do their work properly. I speak about:
- Choice of apartments
- Fixing technical issues
- Positioning of cameras
- Choice of participants (Why put people who are clearly not suitable for the project under the pressure you mentioned above?)
Some examples where failure was obvious:
- Adel: Way too big apartment for a single girl, cameras too far from action
- Jakar: Bringing back one of the most controversial and unpopular participants can only result in failure
- Mori: Old ugly apartment combined with a participant not even able to provide a basic level of cleanliness
- Capricorn & Aqualibra: Bad camera placements whit the refusal from managers to improve them. Combined with manager not telling much about the project to participants
2 Likes
if you think back the best places to watch had ppl in late 20s
the 18 to 23 still had the shy ness in them from what i have seen with my time here
For me it’s difficult telling the age only from looks. So I won’t judge about that
i also think a limit needs to be added on how many realms a manager can have so you dont end up with the endless loop of same shit day after day
5 Likes
The fact is that younger people have more energy and tend to socialise more. I am afraid middle aged people don’t have these advantages to the same extent.
1 Like
all i see from the young ppl is tits and uno and sometimes race to nut sex
1 Like
Guys all these feedback ideas here are from about 1% of the total viewers . well over 95% of paying viewers, who are not active forum members are happy with VHTV and the quality provided , and its because of them not complaining that nothing will change , and before anyone starts sayin that the viewing figures have dropped drastically ,well most of that is because of the loss of uk viewers due to the age verification law .
4 Likes
We viewers should have the right to have the cameras placed where we want and not the managers. It’s us at the end of day that pay VHTV and subscribe to the site and view the apartments and cameras we did help them to fix the angles but the manager refused and so another couple left. VHTV and managers NEVER listen to us they do what they want and so we get bad angles not enough cameras and too many hiding spots.
7 Likes
I don’t think that only the UK is so much viewers
1 Like