Shelia

Not true. Kaya said it’s not up to VHTV to mentor residents, which is reasonable. If she didn’t say it outright, she certainly inferred it was up to the manager to solve the problem. Henry’s the manager. He should solve the problem.

And, as Max said, if he needs a little motivation, VHTV can take all his apartments offline.

First, it was an “excellent idea”. Then you do a complete 180.

4 Likes

this debate still going on ,???
Trying You Can Do It GIF by STARCUTOUTSUK
Springs to mind !!!

footnote: my comment wasnt an invatation to continue the debate, just think about what im implying , take a deep breath and MOVE-ON

4 Likes

So you suggest depriving people of their income by taking them offline for a thing they are not involved with at all? How stupid is that? :man_facepalming:

I don’t remember this… (could be just me though)

2 Likes

Probably it’s about George, then there was a reason to shut down other places

2 Likes

Me neither… VHTV never used collective punishment of course.

Well these were completey different circumstances of course. It was not about punishing apartments for a thing which went wrong in another apartment.

1 Like

Flat 79 (Timotheo & KristyKrabs) was such a case back then, it went offline because of another flat.

As I said, I’m not in favour of it, it just continued the mind game that jabbs had started regarding blocking and proof.

I am not of the opinion that for such an ‘offence’ (in this case by Shelia) the entire existence of a manager and thus of many participants should be destroyed.

Edit: Text slightly improved/extended so that you can see that I am referring to Shelia here.

1 Like

I didn’t want to mention any manager names, because you’re not supposed to talk about them. :innocent:

But I agree that it was a worse offence at the time.

You are comparing apples with pears and not apples with apples. :man_facepalming:

1 Like

Let’s just leave the topic, I had written and sent the first reply to Kaya where I hadn’t seen the replies from both of you yet.

It was just the answer that there had never been anything like it. It wasn’t about why it was like that.

We’re just going to leave the subject alone now, aren’t we?

its Henry he gets away with everything he does . he should have been banned a long time ago for the things he has done IE hitting Mira more than once . He makes to much money for VHTV so theywont do anything

3 Likes

Not involved with! He’s the manager of his apartments. That makes him responsible for all of them regardless of what’s going on in them.

Same as an owner of a business is responsible for anything that happens in that business even if he had nothing to do with the issue.

1 Like

From what I have been able to pick up from this issue in particular, Henry is supposedly the administrator of around about 5 apartments or so. That is if not the sources that I have heard it from is wrong. :fire:

This topic was automatically opened after 16 hours.

Thanks. I’ll take your word for that because I just don’t know.

:memo: Note: I tried to post this 17 hours ago, but the topic closed while I was typing. It just reopened 20 minutes ago.

2 Likes

Maybe I should have clarified. When I say “you” I don’t mean her personally. Unless she is VHTV and not just an employee?

1 Like

She is an employee at VHTV, as far as I understand it. Everyone who works at VHTV is an employee. And, just like every employee there, including the CEO, she represents the company.

I’m not quite sure what you mean by, “unless she is VHTV”, but all employees there speak for the company, which makes them all VHTV, I would say.

Thought Henry did her in for a second (cough)…

Seriously, as some/most of the participants work for VHTV, then they should move away from the “Hidden Real Life Cams” gimmick.