Speaking about Kendall…
4 Likes
The girl from your pics is new and doesn’t have a name. Kendall is her
I tagged you and Jabs few days ago to add Kendall to the wiki. Even posted the pics
1 Like
My idea!! I demand royalties!! Lol😆
1 Like
Did she get added to Wiki?
Depends if she meets the naming requirements, This is the post from the other day, she had sex but was clothed and according to John will never likely get naked
I never said you complained about me, only what I posted.
It isn’t.
The app did nothing to her face, except make it visible. It merely filled in the background and the foreground around her face. Her face was not changed from your original in any way, except that now you can see it.
If you think the picture I posted is in any way worse than the picture you posted, where you can barely make out her face, at all, then you need glasses, or a better prescription. None of the apps I use distort any faces, whatsoever. If they did I would never use them.
The app did not do that. That is her face straight out of your original.
This is your original.
This is a crop to her face directly from your original. No changes.
This is exposure corrected using AI.
This is exposure corrected without using AI. (BTW, this is the best out of seven different apps, and it’s a mess. It still has all of the distortion, noise, artifacts, polarization, etc., that was in your original, but you can see her face.)
But, forget about exposure. Show me where her face is in any way altered, contorted, out of shape, distorted, changed, misshapen, etc., from your original photo.
1 Like
I lost any hope or desire to show or explain it to you. Look at her face again :
And now look at what you posted. If this is not totally distorsing the reality, then nothing is
By the way, you choose the worst possible pic to play with. There are so many pics with her full face posted, but yet, you choosed one that wasn’t posted to highlight her face (hence why the face is not fully visible) but a different part of her body i.e : 
If you go back to my original post, you will understand the context of why i posted that pic: it is the only one where her shape can be seen better.
Now you’re questioning the naming requirements ? Since when 2 rounds of sex is not enough to get a name ? Stop playing silly games here
Just to show you the difference, look how AI is enhancing the pic i posted:
Original:
And AI enhanced :
2 Likes
I hate artificial intelligence is ruining our lives…(long live normality)…
3 Likes
1 Like
I know what you mean, but you have to admit that the result is pretty good. She’s a natural beauty…
I know the post, just is tagging me and @jabbath1987 enough to say that’s her name, or shouldn’t it be, that a MO reconfirms, she gets that name?
And you are the one giving the names here?
Didn’t know that, then just go ahead and put her to Wiki.
I agree but I think the natural person can never surpass artificial intelligence being yourself is the most beautiful thing in this world…
2 rounds of sex when dressed?, changing clothes in blind spots, don’t want to be “exposed” on camera, I’ve seen you protest over more but it’s someone you like so obviously the threshold changes, anyway just for you I’ll leave it to someone else to decide
3 Likes
Oh right yes I get your point about just tagging the two of you when there is more then you two doing the job, I’m happy to leave the naming judgement to others, i just check the wiki when saving to the archives
That is not the point,
Tagging any MO doesn’t mean, it’s decided is the point.
…Unless it gets some reconfirmation.
If you where paying attention, i am not the one who gave her the name. I only tagged you and Jabs asking if one of you can add her. I even put the pics for it.
If you don’t, it’s fine, someone else will do it.
The reason i tagged you two is simply because that’s how i got used for a long time. Nothing else. In fact, i think i only asked Bluewinner few times to add a name in the past. All the rest, Jabs most of the times and recently you as well
1 Like