You can only fix the exposure on photos you have the RAW data image from without altering the actual appearance of the photo. So unless you have the RAW data image the photos are not identical and of course will look different.
Her face is not the same and looks a bit artificial. Nothing against your photo. If you like it that way it is fine. It is not really my thing. Looks very “ai-ish” to me.
This is a bit looser crop of the original John posted. Also a bit looser than the one I used in all the other photos above. It’s almost identical to one of the pictures I posted. The only thing extra you can see on the right side of this picture is more hair. The left edge of this picture is the boundary of the frame. I couldn’t go any further than that. And no AI was used in the production of this picture. It’s a simple crop done with my file manager.
There’s no hair on her chin, it stops before it touches her chin. You can actually see a thin, black space between her chin and her hair. She’s not laying on anything on the left side of her face. She raised her head up to look at the camera. Nothing was cut off, nothing is a different shape, nothing is thinner, and the angles of the face are what John posted. That’s all I had to work with.
You might also notice she seems to have more makeup on than she normally does. Certainly more than the most recent picture John posted.
But, even if all of that were not true, the app did not change the shape of her face. It’s exactly identical to what John posted.
Okay John, you have it your way. You always find reason, even if it’s unreasonable, to criticize the images I post. The picture you posted was egregiously underexposed. I tried to make it look better for you.
It’s as if you can’t stand anybody to post anything better than what you posted, but what you posted was awful, horrible. I just wanted to make it look a little better. You’re welcome.
IMO the original pictures are much better than what you posted. she is a beautiful girl but your AI generated photos do not reflect her beauty at all. it’s a big from me.
It’s a delicate situation where I’m sure we all understand wanting to make the pictures look the best they can, but I think it is not always an improvement
Man, this is not about me. Those AI generated pics, don’t look natural at all. In this particular situation, it made it much worse than the reality. Especially in few of the pics. That’s all.
Not about you? OMG! You’ve been complaining about what I post for months. You always seem to find something to criticize, especially if it’s a girl that you like. I can’t even believe you said that.
Man, relax. I never complained about you. This is not personal. If i did ( and i did once or twice) was purely and only about how the app you’re using is completely changing the reality. And not at all in a positive way. Today in Kendall’s case, there is nothing in common between how she naturally looks and what the app did.
And what i post is exactly what and how is seen on cams, with good or bad light. The most i ever did to the pics i post, was to adjust the brightness. And that in very few cases. If you believe that what i posted, a totally natural pic of Kendall is worse than the massive horriblle shite you’re posting using that app, then there is very little we have to talk about.
That app not only makes all the photos look artificial but also distorts the faces, completely changing people’s appearance. Especially when you’re trying to add a smile to a photo where the person wasn’t smiling. It’s totally horrible how it looks.
Look at how beautiful Kendall is and what that app did. One next to other.
It doesn’t need to be an expert to see the difference. Just to show you, i used the AI from my phone to add some light to the pic i posted. Look the result