Obvs it doesn`t have an answer that stands with his comments 
yeah
I’ve made decent statements all along! You just did not agree! Sir, I’ve been in litigation all my life, I know how to choose my battles. And I know the response that VHTV gave was going to be just that.
I can see things that some people can’t from my line of work.
All the other s__t I write is pure sass, no fucks given, laid back and so unbothered by how personal and almost woeful some of these folks in this forum are.
I missed one. Thanks
Can I say I think I have said three times I’m not going to comment anymore, but this was a serious incident and when you see comments you disagree with you have to respond. I will say I don’t think VHTV’s statement on what happened has helped either, it has just put petrol on the fire and kept the conversation going.
BULLLLLLL SHIT!
That is what we doing since yesterday here.
And you still havent answered the question whether or not you agree with the fact that a man snuck up behind a woman and plunged his fingers inside her when she didnt even know he was there.
I’m quite happy if you disagree with what I say @NEED2p!
1 Like
you can debate about the r__e even though to normal people its clear what happened but theres 100% conclusive video evidence of the girl being sexually ______ yet vhtv is telling us at worst it was inappropriate.
If you think so mate! But reposting it 400 times is not changing anything.
Most of the time when I comment, it is almost to see how people respond and if they are willing to see things from another view.
As I said, I played this out in my head 100 times, if this had really gone to court and they were all cross-examined, the defense lawyer would roast her and rip her to shreds on the bench, and so would the boys from her lawyer.
At the end of the day, the footage does not have concrete evidence! If this girl shows back up on VHTV after all of this, and gets _____ and goes fucking with dudes again, you all will look so stupid!
@NEED2p @Victor1297 what`s your opinion about this, how will you call it? Veronique was wasted and fast as___p
2 Likes
Sorry, John, I cannot give an opinion as I would need to see more from them throughout the day together to know whether he was out of line.
You have all you need there in the video, absolutely all. Again, if you dont remember, but im sure you do, Golo bringed her there, there is no them together throughout the day, Junior was s___ping on the sofa all the time Golo stayed with the girl in the kitchen. She got _____ badly, Golo fucked her, then Junior joined for a threesome, Golo as usual p________t, followed by the girl, then this happens. Well, your opinion pls?
That’s not correct, the only context we are given is what you have typed out. Someone making a judgement on what you have said happened to other people is hearsay
Firstly, my day is not spent on VHTV, I have a life and a job, so I don’t see everything that happens every day.
I’ve mentioned to your earlier I work in litigation, you seem to be a smart man, so I guess know what that is all about, and the way my brain would be wired.
You’ve asked me what I thought of the video and I stand by my earlier response.
You are telling me your version of what you saw, in my profession, I’ll take your statement but until I can fully review everything I am unable to give you my verdict.
And this video just does not give me enough to say Junior r__ed her, I would need more.
So i have edited the video? what is not correct? Hey, you bunch of Medea`s trolls, fk off
You misunderstand, I’m saying the video is not enough without context
How come it is not enough??? Veronique p________t s___ping and Junior fingering her without her consent. What is not clear?
Good Night John!