This might seem like a daft question, but…
If you only get a ‘name’ if you are ‘active’, then why has Chyna got a ‘name’?
That is a very timely and legitimate question. 
Without actions
Very unsurprisingly, I need to add.
Well if you count baths and showers actions i suppose 
I do count those two options as actions, but not absolutely all the time within this specific concept.
Chyna actually makes it her specific aim to perform those two actions more or less all the time. That is not even over doing it.
So, @robwin, do you think jumping into the BCC constitutes enough to warrant being ‘named’?
I always thought (rightly or wrongly) that ‘having sex’ was what gave the right to be ‘named’ … am I incorrect in my thinking?
We just have to face it. Someone is camera shy just to be camera shy. 
The “I’ve got 3 women in the apartment, and it doesn’t look like I’m going to get any tonight” look…
Maybe, but why get ‘named’ then? 
That is a very legitimate question to ask to the one that actually gave her the name. 
Without having to scroll through months and months of posts… do you happen to know the answer? 
Eh… No, actually I do not know. I am very sorry. It would have made things very much easier if that were the case.
She was fucked by Henry but only audio, in a room without cams.
Plus, there are always exceptions so you don’t have to say
“the blackhaired, that is always at Henry’s, Shana’s, Alida’s, Nerina’s, and she is Shana’s girlfriend”
For someone who is at least giving footjobs in bathtubs and is always around showing pussy and titts, I guess there can be, in my personal opinion should a name be given. There are other examples, where it can make sense.
The ones who did it took a good decision in my opinion.
Whilst I can, in part, accept your explanation…
I am sure that there have been occasions when someone was not ‘seen’ to perform anything, and therefore was not granted a name, so again, I merely say that IMO Chyna does not deserve to be ‘named’. 