No i dont agree. ARGENTINA top one in FIFA about 4 years. You are a dazzeld engilsh fan. England is a mediocre ream. And i remember what ypu said about England when won Croatia. Kkk you said i i am convinced England is the best. Poor soul
3 Likes
Over 1,0 i snitt. Det skal godt gjøres ü lokalisere en spiss med et eventuelt bedre snitt ü komme med. 
1 Like
Kane scored 37 times in 2026
Halland 33 times
Fight with the numbers
Today, probably not, but Just Fontaine scored 14 goals for France in 6 matches in the World Cup in 1954. The record is still standing, after over 70 years!
2 Likes
I am half Brazilian of mother, and half german of father. And i think noruega will beat Brazil. I never will be dazzled. Argentina champion again.
1 Like
Perhaps it depends on where you pick the numbers. Anyway, they are both brilliant 
For you @kaya
5 Likes
Nope, this is what I wrote:
For me, the match against Croatia was Englandâs best performance of the tournament so far. And yes â I was dazzled by that match. As things stand today, I still think England are among the top eight favourites. DR Congo played very well today, especially in the first half, and I wouldnât call Englandâs performance a mediocre one, as that would also downplay how strong Congo were. I thought Congoâs performance in the first half in particular was outstanding. But in the end, itâs always the result that counts, whether you like the performance or not. And at least they managed it without extra time or a penalty shootout.
Look, what you said comparing France and Argentina is so far removed from realityâthese are simply the two best teams in the world, the ones that will play in the final. You called them âmediocreââwhich means averageâbut at no point were they ever merely average. Argentina won the World Cup, then the Copa AmĂŠrica; they finished first in their group, are ranked number one by FIFA, and won all three of their matches. Argentina is above average because they did everything required of them; no other team has better results or performancesânot even France, since Argentina won the Copa AmĂŠrica while France didnât even make the Euro final. As for Englandâwhen you spoke of a ânew England,â you implied they were the team to beat because they had reached the Euro final; if this is a ânewâ Englandâeven better than the Euro finalist versionâit implies theyâre going to be world champions. Otherwise, it wouldnât be ânewââit would just be more of the same. Youâre trying to downplay it now, but your earlier comments showed you were dazzled by the hype. You can hate Argentina all you want, but they are number one; theyâve won everything theyâve competed in over the last four years. They are the team to beat, whether you agree or not.
2 Likes
And as Iâve said, itâs not just a matter of being the team to beat or having the best player in the world. That only happens because the Argentine team, right now, is the one with the most grit, passion, hunger, and drive to winâno one could achieve all that in four years relying solely on Messi. Messi is just the cherry on top.
i knew it , SEE ! you do have a sense of humour.!
3 Likes
Letâs just leave it at that. There seem to be some interpretation and translation issues between us, and I donât really have the time - and honestly the motivation anymore - to keep debating. You can think whatever you want about me. Thoughts are free.
Iâve still got to deal with the Three-Quarter Standings (78 out of 104 matches), and I want to get it done today since I already announced it for today. The evaluation will still take at least another hour. Amen. 
2 Likes
Okay. Youâre just another one of those starry-eyed types. All thatâs left for you lot is to root for random national teams like Cape Verde and the like. In reality, nothing in the world is unbeatable; Argentina could lose, but all signs point the other way. âMediocreâ means average; mediocre isnât badâitâs better than bad. Hardly anyone on this forum likes Argentina; itâs full of English and French fansâmostly starry-eyed Europeans who canât accept Argentinaâs long-standing dominance and feel compelled to lash out against it. But I think youâre going to try to swallow Argentina, get sick, and puke it right back up⌠lol. I donât claim to have the absolute truthâanything can happen in sports, and Argentina could loseâbut the way I see football (without the starry-eyed hype or bias), thatâs unlikely to happen. Good luck with your England team and your starry-eyed friends and fans; I have nothing left to debate with you.
Even the norwegians can be able to lose. I am saying that as a norwegian. 
Look, even though I have a Brazilian mother, I think Norway is going to win. Sure, Brazil has a chanceâIâd put it at 55% for Norway and 45% for Brazilâand I hope Iâm wrong (given my Brazilian side), but Brazil is a team that lacks creativity; they rely too much on sheer pressure and donât have enough motivated players. I see Norway showing more dedication and passion to winâperhaps on penalties, after a 1â1 draw.
2 Likes
2 Likes
Just another sycophantic Englishmanâjust like England, stuck in the same place for 60 years. And mind you, the ball didnât even cross the line in '66. kkkkk
your so cute when your mad 
1 Like
Iâm not madâitâs just that you remember the Euros, right? You were all hyped up, but I told you from the start: England would swim and swim only to drown right before the finish lineâtheyâd end up runners-up again. I said that back when they hadnât even reached the knockout stage yet. If youâre honest, youâll remember I predicted England would finish second in the Euros. So this time you couldnât help yourself; you had to come back, seeing as weâve got a new little buddy whoâs just as dazzled by England as you always are.