With all that dance hopping around, itâs hardly surprising 
En dĂ©chirantle dessin quâelle avait fait pour pyro et elle il es clair que toute relation entre pyro et camellia soit dĂ©finitivement brisĂ©
Artistâs work tearing/destroying:
An Artistic Manifesto or Conceptual Gesture
In this case, the destruction is not a defeat but part of the artistic process or even the final artwork itself.
Emphasizing the Process:
The artist highlights that the process of creation is more important than the final product. By destroying the finished piece, the focus shifts to the act itself.
Emotional Breakthrough or Catharsis
Art is often personal and therapeutic. Tearing up a painting can be a physical act of liberation.
Letting Go of the Past:
The work may have been created during a period of pain, sorrow, or anger. Its destruction is a symbolic ending of that chapter and a liberation from that burden.
je suis tous a fait dâaccord avec toi
Iâm trying to recall a tv broadcast about one of the worldâs top photographers who had a habit of destroying his most award-winning photos after gallery exhibitions. When asked why, he said what matters is how it was createdâthat on its own, it has no value.
That his greatest satisfaction comes when that proof of excellence no longer exists, and he tries to recreate it again.
That sure is a lot of depth and philosophy for a Saturday nightâŠâŠI just wanted to see some boobs. 
InterestingâI asked AI who that photographer was, and it gave me a whole listâŠ
For example:
Nobuyoshi Araki (born 1940)
The Japanese photographer is likely the most famous photographer who intentionally destroys his own work. His handling of his photographs has become part of his artistic expression.
What did he do? Araki is renowned for physically manipulating his photographs:
Cutting and tearing: He cut or tore prints with a knife or his hands.
Pinning with needles: He punctured negatives with needles to âdamageâ them.
Writing and painting on them: He used markers, ink, and paint to write on the surface of photographs.
Burning: He also burned them in his performances and installations.
Why? He did this not out of frustration but as part of his artistic process. He believed that by destroying or damaging the image, he added another layer of story, time, and memory. For him, imperfection became part of the aesthetics. He said: âDestruction is also part of creation.â
Letâs hope Camellia isnât an artist like Araki.
And that she doesnât destroy all her other works when sheâs frustrated. Because I actually think her artworks are quite beautiful. 
Itâs always rewarding to watch our early bird stretching her feathers in the morning.
Camellia quitte lâappartement
Cue another Radu intervention?
It appears that way. Paintings hanging in LR are gone.
Or is she just rearranging stuff? So far it doesnât really look like sheâs systematically emptying out her closet.
If she is leaving though, good for her. Letâs face it, sheâs really too good for this cesspool of depravity.
I have to attend a family thing today, wonder if sheâll still be here when Im back.
She has assembled all her devices and packed them neatly. Unlike many others, she tidies up in a structured manner and does not seem to move with garbage bags, as is often done here.