Just because I find some apartments very boring does not mean that they do not deserve to be on VHTV. Saying that I do wonder why some apartments are here as they fail to provide zero entertainment or depict any semblance of real life.
Dexter & Kelly, unless someone moves there on a full time basis then this is just another wasted apartment, yea I get it that some are into bondage but that is not the point, they are very seldom there.
Jules. A single guy doing very little other than an occasional visitor, not real entertainment but heck I suppose some will somehow justify his existence on VHTV.
Candy Red, A single woman who other than lies in bed does absolutely nothing to create entertainment. As I write this she has been on or in her bed for over 30 hours. Yes, she has been on her phone, watched TV, got up to piss, got up to feed herself but otherwise zilch entertainment. I do realise that she is a fine-looking woman, but entertainment is less than zero.
I do find other apartments as boring as paint drying but that is my opinion, and I am sure that others find them enthralling. The 3 mentioned I am pretty sure that it will be difficult to justify their being on VHTV.
2 Likes
With so many apartments, houses and group homes I believe that VHTV is trying to accommodate all types of subscribers and viewers. It could be tenants that give you a minor voyeur tease while you watch paint dry or in-your-fucking-face nudity, sex and porn. Little bit of something for everyone which in turns puts tons of money into the owners bank account. Even old mature tenants are on the appetizing plate. Paying for 30 to 40 places for tenants to live with all the technical stuff and employees is not cheap so they are making good money. I don’t think “entertainment” by tenants is required by VHTV. Show up sometimes and do a bit of tease is the minimum required. Probably low pay for them though. Do more, go wild with plenty of nudity and sex will more than likely pay big bucks. In time, with increased subscribers I can see VHTV dropping the so-called “no entertainment” tenants. VHTV is experimenting still and once they find their niche (biggest return on their investments) they will probably streamline into more specific “high performance” tenants. Probably in the direction of voyeurs watching live porn in the making. As they say “sex sells” and more money to be made than with plain old fashioned voyeurism which is becoming a thing of the past.
I am in no ways suggesting they go into the porn business. In all honesty voyeurism flew out of the window ages ago on this site. All I am stating is some apartments should not be here as they serve no purpose. I am not on expert or in fact would know nothing on running this type of business but in my opinion the apartments mentioned probably cost more to run than they get in revenue.
Hector & Marla do VHTV from their own home. Have to struggle to see nudity and sex with them. Candy Red is only nudity sometimes. Yes, I agree with you but at the opposite end is porn style tenants with constant nudity and sex. Even Nina & Kira are slow showing. Obviously VHTV has a wide berth or leeway amongst all the tenants in what they do in front of the cams. I guess if VHTV had tenant votes for approval by subscribers the “low entertainers” will be gone.
1 Like
I do not even mind if there is no nudity as long as some sort of entertainment is given to the viewers. I would rather watch paint dry than watch Nina and Kira but I am pretty sure some find their mundane life a sheer joy to watch. Hector and Marla are about as close to voyeurism as we are going to get, real people doing normal things.