Well, Ariela doesn’t spend the day cooking either 
1 Like
if they weren’t already snoring
2 Likes
Excuse me! According to a previous US President oral doesn’t constitute sex! 
2 Likes
The defence used by President Clinton with Monica Lewinski.
off topic but a good defense
When Is Sex Not “Sexual Relations”?
By Richard Lacayo
When Bill Clinton gave his deposition in the Paula Jones case, he said he had never had “sexual relations” with Monica Lewinsky. But Lewinsky has reportedly testified to a number of acts that most people think of as sex. Can both statements somehow be true? Is it possible that the two of them had intimate contact, yet Clinton still did not perjure himself? In the intricate world of the law, a world of hairsplitting distinctions where the President is famously at home, it just may be so. Here’s why.
At Clinton’s deposition, Jones’ legal team asked Judge Susan Webber Wright to approve a very precise, three-part definition of sexual relations. Clinton’s attorney Robert Bennett objected to the whole definition, but to the last two parts especially, as being too broad. Wright agreed to disallow parts 2 and 3, leaving only the first, narrowest definition of sex in place.
With that, Clinton may have been given the room to offer a technically “true” denial to the question of whether he had sex with Lewinsky–even if she happened to perform fellatio on him. The truncated definition characterizes sex in terms of a checklist of body parts, including the genitals, breast and thigh. Oral sex would not necessarily require the President to touch anything on Lewinsky that appears on that list. Strange as it may sound, under one reading of the definition, Lewinsky could have been having sex with him (because she was “touching” the President’s genitals) while at the same moment, he was not having sex with her. (At the deposition, Clinton wasn’t asked if she had sexual relations with him, just if he had them with her.) Isn’t the law a wonderfully intricate device?
There are problems with the legalistic defense. For one thing, if Clinton and Lewinsky did have oral sex, is it really likely that he did not touch any body parts mentioned in the Jones definition? (Lewinsky has testified that Clinton fondled her.) And because that definition says that a person engages in sex if he or she “causes” contact with the genitals of “any person,” it could be argued that Clinton caused Lewinsky’s contact with his, even if he did not otherwise touch her. He could reply that she was the cause, or at least the active partner, while he was merely the passive receiver, but that makes him seem like either an implausibly shrinking violet or a very cool customer. Beyond all that, Lewinsky’s secret grand-jury testimony may simply be so detailed and explicit that it leaves no room for loopholes.
Even if the word-wiggle keeps Clinton out of the perjury trap, it won’t help him politically because it doesn’t account for his Jan. 26 televised insistence that he “did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.” When he spoke before the cameras, the lawyerly definition of sex wasn’t in f___e. And in a recent TIME/CNN poll, 87% of those questioned said that oral sex was, well, sex. Hiding behind the ultimate tortuous legalism could help the President get through his testimony, but it won’t pass the laugh test with the American people–which is why Clinton won’t be parsing the meaning of “sexual relations” in any public statements. --By Richard Lacayo.
2 Likes
Very true regarding couples. As for Will, well I can’t give a true reply as I really haven’t been watching so not much sense me speculating. And I agree. as an adult she makes her own life choices and as any adult has to live with them they be they right or wrong…learn and adjust accordingly.
2 Likes
Superb naked images of them both but wasted because of distance from cams. Daft.
1 Like
I fully remember all of that lol
2 Likes
He only got caught because he dropped a load on her dress and she never washed it that dam DNA will get you caught every time
1 Like
There are more than a thousand videos… it’s obvious from your nonsense answer that you can’t reach any source.
I have no intention of convincing you of anything. Happy Sunday 
Soooo 100% true. Had it not been for that dress and his DNA on it wouldn’t have had any traction and the his impeachment would have never happened.
2 Likes
You’re the one who gave me dumb answers. I don’t need to prove anything to you.
Will wants to take that ass if he hasn’t already. We all know how much he likes anal.
3 Likes
He’s the king of anal it’s only a matter of time
1 Like
OMG The guys caught up 
1 Like
If they are having anal sex, then that’s something she hasn’t done with her husband Sébastian. What a shame, Seb just let her go, she’s not worth it. Two many men has came and gone since you left to take care of your d______r.
1 Like
I dont think they did i had it zoomed in just now and the cock looks too low
1 Like
So are Sebastian and Ariela still together?