Wasn’t it said the view blocking is only a temporary solution or is blocking cameras now allowed? 
2 Likes
Can’t touch this
5 Likes
3 Likes
you should know by now anything is allowed , it all depends on the admin in charge at the present time and that admins use of descretion 
2 Likes
Whose head is on his body? Is that you? Did you do that?
2 Likes
Nope it is just a gif I picked 
1 Like
It is not only the blocking of the camera that is tolerated, but here it is also allowed to simply switch off a camera because it does not fit into the concept. Very strange, in my opinion.
4 Likes
I think you’re right. Ariela should certainly look at some examples from her CB colleagues and learn a few things. Nevertheless, she should create her own image, because there is a lot of competition. That’s why she needs her own brand so that she can stand out from the competition. Perhaps she should show off her super body more quickly and score points with it. At the very least, I wish her every success
5 Likes
Look who’s back, barton the bum. Mr “three minutes” himself
2 Likes
Camera 3 no longer has a bear in front of the lens. Unfortunately, however, its direction has been changed for the worse.
3 Likes
I wonder why it wasn’t fixed? It is quite obvious it got hit…
1 Like
I guess you can say he must be back because he brought all his stuff back too ridiculous
I have to agree with you. The covering of the room with various things is becoming more and more extreme. Also, no videos of the shows after April 19 will be offered in repeats. Apparently, the makers of vhtv support the banning of the website’s paying supporters, an unbelievable process.
1 Like
I think it used to be called. That it was a temporary shutdown and concealment of the cameras. Because of the streaming at CB. And that Ariela was allowed to do that. So that we can’t see the screen of the Lappi. Until there’s a better solution. At the moment, I find it hard to believe in a new solution. Because it’s always the same setup of the equipment.
Also, I still haven’t really understood why streaming and the view of the Lappi is the problem with Ariela?
Just take a look at the stremings in other apartments. Take Katty, for example. You can even see the viewers there. Or in Alice Paradise, you could see the man jerking off on her cell phone screen.
But well, there will be an agreement, otherwise Ariela would have to pay a fine for covering the camera, right?
Nevertheless, I wish her all the best and much success in whatever she does. She should not lock out her Vhtv fan family.
3 Likes
I’ll say it right at the beginning: what follows is speculation this time, not knowledge.
I have the feeling there’s a conflict of interest here. Not with Ariela, but with the association that supplies her with the hardware for CB. On the one hand, there’s data protection when CB users are visible on VH (which doesn’t seem to be a problem in other apartments, though), and on the other hand, that the VH cameras shouldn’t appear in the CB image. That seems to be a requirement of them.
In the beginning, there were massive problems with complaints when there was a mix of VH and CB names in the CB chat. It’s become less frequent, but still happens occasionally (at least the problem in the chat; I don’t know what the complaints situation is).
The whole setup in the living room is… strange. They should have looked for a way to make everything work simultaneously without interfering with each other. And there definitly would have been a way… if EVERYONE involved had been interested in it.
but my feeling is that the people who are NOT in front of the camera had the last word in the end. For example, when camera 4 was deactivated…
5 Likes
I do not blame Ariela for any of that. It is her manager who obviously made a kind of strange deal with VHTV allowing to cover and removing cameras.
The only thing IMHO she should not have started with in the very beginning is the webcamming as I can’t imagine she earns much there as she also has to pay the so called “helpers” obviously.
It will hurt her reputation here and I think there is no benefit at all.
But that is only my opinion…
6 Likes
I see it a little differently: I don’t blame her, but I do hold Ariela responsible for it… partly.
But I also know her attitude towards many things better than most people here, and unfortunately, I’m not surprised by it…
I don’t know if it was her idea to start CB, or if she was persuaded or convinced to do it. But I already knew about the plans a few weeks in advance (only about the plan to start camming, without the smallest details, though). There would have been enough time to involve everyone involved and find a setup TOGETHER. Apparently, that didn’t happen, or rather, the CB people had the final say.
I think she should have consulted more with others. And I also don’t know if her manager was informed beforehand, and if the shutdown of Cam4 isn’t a kind of frustration-based ‘revenge’.
But okay, her life, her rules. And thus, her success, or her failure.
8 Likes