Don’t you think that constantly telling others what they should do while saying “I shouldn’t do this, I shouldn’t do that” is a double standard?
Let’s put it in different words. How many of us understand russian? So, daily life is not option for the majority! I did live similar situations.
How many would stay and watch if Bella did her daily gymnastic in full sport clothing?
но может получится: “Не говорите что мне делать, я не скажу куда вам пойти” 
Marcie об этом видимо не знает
So you are basically saying you joined this site to watch violence and r__e. Or if you see it, just accept it and move on. R__e is just crossing the line Well your choice, not mine.
Can you quote an example. I have told people that if they don’t want to discuss it they can always go to another topic. I don’t recall telling anyone they have to agree with me.
I would but Bella is a natural exhibitionist which is a bonus. 
I understand about 50% of what is said, but you are right it is a struggle.
But I have also made steps to have personal conversations with a few of the participants giving a better insight into their lives.
I can only say that I personally agree with your view.
How come - you’re telling everyone here that it’s the right thing to do - like in your culture. That literally everyone has to take it into account. But at the same time you’re saying that there’s no way you’ll consider what’s accepted in other cultures. As @Bluewinner said - very immature.
1 Like
Well, nobody is defending r__e and r____ts here. we can all agree that sexual a___e/ m____r/ genocide and etc are wrong and should be dealt with no matter where it happens. I agree with all the slogans that you have written in your post. the question is : who is the judge to determine if the crime has been committed and who is the right person to deal with it. with your logic anyone who witness a wrong doing based on his/her own judgment can pass the sentence and carry it out. That way we did not need to have the institutions that we have today. there would be no court of law and people could execute anyone who they find guilty without due process. this is just not how things are done.
In this case VHTV is the responsible authority who has access to the facts not you or me. and above that there is law of the land. at the moment what you are doing is just to boost your own ego and prove to the world how righteous and morally superior you are, that’s good for you but definitely disturbing to the forum’s well being, it just creates divisions and animosity among the members based on their stance.
1 Like
Where am I telling everyone what to do? I am merely stating my view, perhaps a bit f___efully but hey it was r__e. You are now starting to sound desperate in looking for allies as I do realise that I am going on a bit. I have not become emotional unlike you who seems to be doing everything and anything to discredit me. If name calling does it for you then seems we do not have much to discuss. Get back to the topic.
You probably don’t see the difference between expressing a point of view and imposing it. You are exactly trying to impose what you think is right for me to do. This is called telling others what to do.
1 Like
Are you serious with that statement?
So all the viewers that witnessed the r__e are idiots and should have no voice? The CEO himself admitted it was r__e.
That is exactly what the CEO has done, he passed judgement ‘‘guilty’’ and handed out what he thought was the best. He did not tell us what his harsh sentence was just that it was a harsh sentence. He sent a lady to talk to the lady not who the lady what or how or if she was affiliated to VHTV. I don’t accept his judgement and never will for this case. The r____t should not be on this project (my view).
Really, I thought the law of the land was the responsible authority.
Really that is how you see being outraged at r__e. Get a better defense because that one stinks.
So if everything but hey look what a good fuck that was or, wow look at the boobs and ass on her then it is that. I was under the impression the forum was to discuss things not matter how much you disagreed with them.
So if it is against your stance then best not discuss it as it might hurt some feelings.
But that is exactly what you have done. You saw a r__e, you admitted it was a r__e and I now state that I have a very different outlook at how you handled it. So now I must keep quiet and accept that you know better.
1 Like
Yes, I have not seen a single comment defending r__e or sexual a___e. there were a few who did not think it amounted to r__e, but there was no one praising the act.
Where did I say that? anyone can voice their concern, but it’s not up to a few viewers to decide the punishment. The CEO like most of us believed it was r__e after watching the footages, but after doing his investigation and talking to all parties involved he made a different decision based on the facts on hand. you might have made similar decision if you were in his position, we will never know how we would decide as we do not know the whole story and all the facts.
Yes that’s what his job requires him to do. you have the right to accept it or not, but you have no right to call people names and try to punish them on your own.
If you read my comment more carefully, that was my next sentence. obviously there is law in that country, and if the girl had the same interpretation of the events as you do, she could definitely press charges against the guys, and if that was the possibility the apartment would have never come back online.
I am sorry Marcie, you are just a keyboard warrior. and you don’t want to listen to anyone so you end up repeating yourself.
Yes, and we are discussing things. just remember that freedom of speech is not absolute anywhere, there are rules on how you are supposed to behave and be civil, especially on a private platform like this one, if you’r disturbing the peace and annoying everyone, the platform owners have every right to restrict your speech. and that’s true for every online platform. the VHTV has been very tolerant so far and I applaud them for that.
Like I said there is a limit to everything
1 Like
Indeed, in all latitudes of our small planet, evolution has not been the same. Which is not surprising. Except that some “universalists” (especially Europeans) thought that “the inferiors” should evolve towards our “model”. So we colonized, waged wars, crushed rebellions for decades. Then the reverse movement took hold; let us free these peoples from oppression (mainly European), respect their traditions, establish cordial relations. I mean by that, wanting to globalize a solution to a problem is a futile fight! Stoning, f___ed marriages of very young girls, excision, the extermination of minorities, …
If already everyone manages to do good around him (family and friends) he will not have missed his life.
2 Likes
Well, look, I saw what you saw. R__e. Unlike you, I looked into it. I found out there was no r__e in the legal sense of the word. They were punished for showing us that r__e. Imitating r__e, d__g use and other things forbidden by the rules of the project are also forbidden. You’re just going along with your line of reasoning.
That’s why these are called “Third world countries”.
That is a very ignorant and uneducated stance.
Try and educate yourself before you use such inappropriate canned responses.
1 Like
5 Likes
This is why this site is a joke. CEO defends anything that will add to his bank account and Jabs is his little puppet.
I see the good and bad points of both views and I don’t condone violence in any way or form but I will not be drawn into a debate that has no debating substance or finality.
I will however point out such crass and debasing statements as the one above.
What’s wrong with you? I didn’t even post in that topic here…
1 Like