And if she goes, how will our viewing experience improve ? We’re just going to have one less girl and apartment to watch. Nothing else
3 Likes
Ugh! Same words again, aren’t you tired?
Acting like a realms “protector”,
and you’re still defending the current situation like no tomorrow
There’s no defense for this.
But still…Ugh
We love Viola and want to see more of her,
and we’re “criticizing” her in a civilized and respectful.
“Criticizing” is the word you don’t understand, I think.
But instead of criticizing this situation,
you’re using still “classic words”…
1 Like
Why do we need to criticize her for ? For living her life as she wants ? For being smarter than others and not becoming a porn actress for some nobodies from the internet who don’t even pay her for it ??? Lol, let’s be serious…
Just watch the places where the girls are willing to do that, it is that simple
And no, i’m not “protecting” anyone, just simply stating the factual reality, for just over 1$ that we’re paying daily, just seeing a girl naked, has already paid off.
Isn’t this the reality ?
4 Likes
“Let’s be serious?” - “Factual reality?”
Anyway, I’m not going to argue with you because I started to think it would be “off topic”,
so I’m not going to prolong this argument, but sometimes people should refrain from acting “fake” and be a little more realistic. Trying to act like everything is fine when everything is actually terrible is nothing but “fake.”
Yes, what does it even mean to be “good” or “terrible”? According to whom? According to what? These are all relative concepts.
But if something is “relative,” shouldn’t it be visible — something we can see with our own eyes? Well, I don’t see anything here — and it’s not just me, no one does.
What you call “realism” might, ironically, be the greatest illusion of all.
We all live in a dream world, and what we call reality is nothing more than a shared illusion we’ve agreed to believe in.
That’s the criticism, and in this realm that’s what I’m criticizing.
Anyway, have a good day.
2 Likes
We don’t need to argue at all. I totally understand if we need to criticise something that we pay for and it’s not happening, like a broken promise. Like the LED lights that are totally ruining the view. Like cams that are not working. Like participants or guests hidding for cams. Like rooms without cams…
But to criticise the fact that the participants are not doing what we want, when we don’t even pay for it, is beyond common sense, isn’t it ???
Have a great day too
5 Likes
Home d.runk…
Perhaps we can agree that we all have our own perception of reality, and that we all have different expectations. Just as everyone has different expectations.
And criticism should also be allowed. If it remains free of offence.
And to those who expect more from Viola, that she is more in front of the cameras. Will probably continue to be disappointed. I don’t think she will change her behaviour because of us. Which is a good thing, after all, it’s her life.
Then we’ll just look for a new sweetheart that’s more in line with our expectations. 
Because if I’ve understood Vhtv’s principle correctly. Without ‘action’, there will be fewer viewers (click figures). Without, or with few viewers, less money. With less money, at some point no more manager. And without a manager, no flat, right?
So the whole thing will take care of itself at some point. 
4 Likes
les mecs dodo pouff
Yes, and with a superman costume 
The cameras there all have a life of their own. Then there are people there. And then the cameras are positioned incorrectly.
4 Likes
5 Likes
You’re boo👻ring now, Mr. Protector. Are we forbidden from expressing our opinions?
1 Like
Sure that we can express our opinion about what we see happening inside the apartments ( all of them, not just Viola’s )
But, directing the way the participants live their lives, isn’t “expressing opinions” but pure manipulation.
6 Likes
Ugh! Enough. Ok. You are right Mr. Pussy Guard.
2 Likes
New girl
11 Likes