Caution and development are antagonists. There must be a reasonable trade-off between caution and risk.
customers to rlc and vhtv are sometimes the same
I agree there will be some overlap, although I don’t think there will be a huge number of people that can afford to pay for premium RLC and premium VHTV every month, so I think a lot of people will choose one or the other.
You are reasoning correctly, and the decision will be influenced by how much we can buy it. We have an understanding of how much it costs to attract one subscriber. If the sales amount and the number of subscribers meet this understanding, we will definitely make a positive decision. But something tells me that this will not happen.
Actually, instead of selling something, nothing prevents RLC from becoming one of our franchisees, while remaining the RLC itself. Moreover, they can become franchisees and send all their traffic through us, thus saving on IT infrastructure management and, in general, on all streaming resources. What I know for sure is that we stream multiple times cheaper than RLC or someone else from our competitors. I’ll make a reservation right away that THIS savings are not associated with a worse picture than theirs. It’s about cameras, and that’s what we’re doing.
for fans nothing is impossible.
rlc operating costs are very expensive ( girls, shooping, iphone,ipad,macbookpro, house)
Apple products, IMHO, are not included in the operating expenses of RLC. I think the ladies make these purchases with their honestly earned money. And in general, the lack of these devices does not mean anything. Apple’s target audience is the poorest.
can be a salary per month or per week, its still very expensive but its their buisness.
честно заработанные деньги = hard-earned money 
Many VH tenants also have iphones, macbooks
Сорян, я не нэйтив спикер ни разу, как гугл переводит - так и пишу.
2 Likes