I would be interested to hear @kaya’s opinion on whether she confirms your statement.
I wouldn’t be so sure, because I could imagine that access to the archive is an important feature for many customers in order to take out a subscription at all. Not everyone has as much time to watch livecams as you do
If someone pays 50$/month only to have access to the archive, when there is basically unlimited free porn on the internet, then i truly feel sorry for him.
As i said, the archive is part of the premium package, same as the timeline.
No, I don’t want that and I don’t have that either.
The point is, and this is where our view differs fundamentally, that it’s not the quantity that decides, but the fact that pornography takes place at all. There are reasons why, in their country, there is a threat of up to 15 years in prison if it were to come out that some of the apartments are being used again and again.
We are back to the start. The difference in our views is clear, you call it porn site because, occasionally, sex does happen. I totally don’t. The most i call it 18+ adult site. In fact, it is a voyeur site, nothing more or less. The reasons why people are watching, are very divers, some for the sex, some for the parties, some for nudity, some for the drama, some for the cats, etc. It isn’t just “porn”.
Sorry, i’m multitasking now and i misread your comment.
I double checked now and, from my perspective, i don’t think that the archive is an very important factor. The main attraction of the site is the fact that we can watch live when something happens. And the timeline. Personally, i only use the archive when searching for ex participants or places. But that’s me, i don’t know what other people do.