the phrase looked like a provocation, too childish
yes, there are many provocations, discontents, sarcasm and other unpleasant ways of communicating in this conversation, but it seemed to me that you were a more mature person and I only expressed some disappointment with my acquaintance
you say a lot of things that I agree with, but that message seemed superfluous to me from you
He threatened to be rude, so I gave him an opportunity to follow through on his threat.
This guy is like Carlos only worse because heās constantly criticizing and attacking Ariela for no reason other than she chooses to live her life by her rules and her decisions, instead of how he thinks she should live.
Several people have tried to explain to him whyās heās so unpopular on this forum, but he refuses to even acknowledge that heās the reason why people dislike him.
He believes he has the absolute right to tell someone else theyāre living their life incorrectly and should live it according to his rules and his antiquated morals.
As I mentioned several people have tried to explain to him that heās not following the forum rules. At this point, no one wants to hear his incessant criticizing of Ariela any longer. We are voyeurs, not directors.
What I said to him may have given him pause to think twice about following through on his threat. That would be a good thing for him, considering the possible consequences, but, unfortunately, not good for the rest of the community. Unless, someone with authority finally decides to explain to him that heās not following the forum rules.
So, when you think about it, how really childish and superfluous was my comment?
You are the most annoying guy in the world. Let the guy have his own opinion. Sometimes itās right; Sometimes itās not like everyone else. This is what is called freedom of expression.
If you donāt like what he writes, move on. There are other posts to read. And let Ariela decide if his advice is good or bad. You are not God to decide what is right or wrong.
But who are we to criticize the opinions and behavior of others?
We can not read, agree or not. Itās up to admins to check rules
I find it strange to be so concerned about the freedom of expression of others.
Itās not other peopleās freedom of expression, itās our freedom of expression. Because when one doesnāt have it, no one has it.
The question is, how far does freedom of opinion go and does it start with abusive criticism, for example?
Thoughts are free and everyone can give free rein to their thoughts, but must all thoughts be posted unfiltered in a forum and thus perhaps verbally hurt other people?
Want to āannoyā that guy back? Remind him who just won all 3 branches of the US govāt in a massive landslide victory. Yeah, that āI stand with Ukraineā guy is the same one who went full on marxist for three days posting anti-Trump BS and told everyone who supports Trump, āYouāre not allowed to comment.ā
LMAO - Full Marxism right there!
Freedom of expression has no limits. If we start imposing limits then there is no freedom of expression. We all have the right to dislike or disagree with an opinion, but not to censor it.
Itās a different thing to offend and slander, and that does have to be recriminated and punished.
And I can say this because I already committed that crime (offending) and was suspended, and it was deserved.
There are also different strict rules depending on the country and usually you can dish it out more than you can take it.
In Germany, for example, you wouldnāt be allowed to say that youāre a useless, stupid pile of shit who should have been aborted.
(please this is an example and is not intended to be a personal insult)
That would be an opinion, but it would be considered a deep insult.
But thatās not an opinion, itās an offence.
Max, youāre going way too far now. Hudson never offended anyone here. Some people agree with him and some people donāt. Also, i never took his comments as ādirectingā like so many others people do here on the forum. And yet, heās non stop being told off by the hardcore Arielaās fanclub. How is that right and his opinion is not ?
He won by 1.5%, one of the lowest margins ever.
Letās go back to topic
I was just exaggerating the statement that opinions can quickly become insults to others.
He had become in favor of total/unlimited freedom of opinion.
It looks like a porn site because people are looking for porn. Nobody looks at a single flat 24/7 because then it looks like a normal boring life.
As soon as the action is over we jump to other cameras and look for other hot action. And when there happens to be ānothing interestingā, we jump to the archives.
This makes VHTV a porn site, more because of the subscriber usage system.
Hello, Iāve come for the cooking courses ā¦ You donāt want to claim otherwise, do you? 
In my opinion, some people here often cross the line between opinion and insult.
But I think everyone has their own boundaries here, donāt they?
I donāt know, i see a clear difference between any known porn site and Vhtv. In my view, porn site means sex 24/7 and nothing else. As it isnāt the case at all on Vhtv, i can not call it a porn site. Thatās why i said an adult version of a reality show like Big Brother but with explicit sex included. This is the closest i can think off. What is closest to a porn site, is the archive, i agree. But thatās not what Vhtv isā¦
