(No one noticed that shy Martha always chooses the worst and shyest guests, intentionally, to avoid images and hide, and only share the bath, so the uninhibited guests are of no interest to Martha, very smart)
![]()
Why
, the picture was in color and two people were kissing ⦠or was something missing? They had just got dressed because they wanted to leave ā¦
Well, Martha isnāt like Tonk, who will take anyone who isnāt at 3 in the trees.
I think sheās also more selective than a Fox or Harmony, where sex was always mandatory on the part of the management!
My vote has nothing to do with the image published, Iām sorry, but rather because of the intention shown in covering everything they did whenever they were in the apartment
Only those who donāt understand Marthaās āstrategyā who doesnāt want, and Iāve also explained elsewhere why this this is allowed this āexceptionā.
Now, he reads minds.
![]()
Just compare the percentages in the way Martha has been sharing the sex she has in the apartment recently
![]()
My spy cameras outside the apartment and the crystal ball are currently undergoing maintenance.
Can you tell me the % rate of where you had sex when & where outside. ![]()
Just look at the files for example
(but there is more of course, very smart Martha)
![]()
You speak in riddles ⦠which files are supposed to show when she had sex outside?
Is there a sex log somewhere?
![]()
There used to be a user who kept a record of when which woman had her period ā¦
![]()
but I am surprised by a sex log from a participant outside the cameras ā¦
Thatās a misuse of the reaction system.
You have no idea what youāre talking about. Stop spouting supposition as fact. You donāt know that she has an agenda unless you can read her mind.
That was the most sensible thing that was said about the matter. He is condescending to those who post!
They can say what they want, but they will see that Martha will mysteriously only find guests who want to hide, and Martha will also use this situation to hide
![]()
Now everyone feeds the troll!
![]()
And, you still canāt read her mind. You have nothing but supposition that you claim to be fact.
First, you abuse the reaction feature, as Alek said, condescending to users by reacting to things that have nothing to do with what was posted.
Then, you make wild accusations about the participants and users that you canāt possibly back up with any kind of facts or proof.
Something should be done about this.
Tonight, or tomorrow, the same time, with mysteriously, the same types of guests
![]()



