I see them as actors who are fine with having sex while the whole world is watching.
Virtually all of them, including Indira, are never shy about being totally naked while handling a sex toy
I see them as actors who are fine with having sex while the whole world is watching.
Virtually all of them, including Indira, are never shy about being totally naked while handling a sex toy
If indira never met kostja, she might of been like all the others, but, meeting her saved her from having to satisfy Henry every week like shana and wendy seem to have to
The name âJohnâ has a long history. It always refers to a man paying a woman for having sex with her.
None of us are having sex with these women. I would keep the name âJohnâ to be used only in its traditional sense. You can call us peeping-Toms. That would be a lot more accurate
I do not know about Shana, but Wendy appears to be much more in Indiraâs mold.
So far she has not had that many encounters with Henry. Letâs see how if she evolves to be a Shana or an Indira. Watching her lately with Koen, I am getting a sense that these two may be becoming a couple
Not sure, but, i still sense thereâs room for shana in his bed, too
A John pays for a sexual service. You are paying for a sexual service when you use this site. Peeping Toms do not pay to peep. You are closer to a John than a peeping Tom.
Yes, so far there is. But less and less often. While Koen and Wendy appear inseparable or close to that
In an online electronic world, Peeping Toms do pay to peep. Welcome to the brave new world.
This is all we are doing: we are peeping.
Unless you can show me that you get to fuck any of these ladies
John is for fucking.
Peeping Tom is for peeping
Whatever helps you s___p at night my friend. However that still does not change the fact that you are paying for a sexual service just like a John does.
So what about those like Ryan who chose to just watch what is available for free. He does not pay.
he gets to see K & I fucking on the couch nightly
Is he also a John ?
I never said Ryan was a John. He is not. He is what you call a free loader. However, that still does not change the fact that you and I are paying for a sexual service just like a John does.
We define the words âsexual servicesâ differently. To me, sexual services is having sex with someone. Period.
Margo Stilley is a well known actress. If you watch the film 9 Songs in which Margo Stilley has actual, real sex many times. Are you paying for a sexual service or are paying for watching a movie ?
WTF? John ? Tom? Talking about absolutely nothing here again
A sexual service can be many things. A sexual service includes sexual intercourse but not all sexual services have to include sexual intercourse. For example, strippers are sex workers that provide a sexual service. That does not mean they have to fuck everyone that come to watch them strip at a club.
You and I are paying for a sexual service just like a John does.
How about the millions of women and girls who go to the beach wearing almost nothing.
Are they just being whores. In countries where women are made to wear burquaâs and chadors, that is exactly how the men imagine those western women all to be: whores who just give it away. They do not even charge you for a service
WTF has that to do with that place here? Back to topic now. You can make a separate topic when you want to talk about Tom, John Doe, Gurtrude or Kunigunde
HAHAHAHAI forgot for a second how it started. I think it started with me saying this.
It has every to do with the place here. Are the women in those apartments whores selling sexual services. That is the question being discussed. So yes, it has everything to do with this place
kapish ? - or as they say in your corner of the world: Alles klar ?
those apartments
You give the answer yourself this is not on topic as you talk about multiple apartments. I will make you a topic where you can discuss that âimportantâ fact
Can I be a Bill instead of a John or Tom please??