Sorry, i didnât asked about Jabbathâs pathetic manipulation. I simply asked you to show me how the rule was changed. if you canât or donât want, itâs fine, just say so
He is not guilty. Guilt is a big word. This should be a civilized discussion. I just do not understand for whom he is âfightingâ here. Nobody he supports got excluded nor any of his posts in the contest got contested. All his posts were totally fine. I never questioned that at all.
Saying that letâs wait if and what Hannah has to say. 
See. You do it again. Attacking me. Why? What did I do? I did not attack you at allâŠ
And what manipulation you are talking about? I did not and wonât vote in this poll here as I do not want to influence anybody with my vote. Everything is as transparent as it can be. There is no manipulation whatsoever.
I am now speaking exclusively for myself and saying what bothers me about John and Hannah in this matter:
-
John has emphasized extremely often that (private) videos are not screenshots. Heâs right about that. But why did he then submit a post with a video himself? Is this behavior correct? (Rhetorical question)
-
Johnâs video contribution was also included in the evaluation.
This is Hannahâs first mistake. -
posts have qualified for the poll that are not pranks.
This is Hannahâs mistake again.
Conclusion: The qualification did not run correctly and therefore it would only have been fair to either count all entries or alternatively to do everything very carefully and check the entries correctly.
Itâs neither one nor the other done, but a weird middle ground that doesnât satisfy about 80% of the voters.
Iâm not judging anyone here. No one is perfect and Hannah is in a very thankless role because she has made an effort and certainly doesnât deserve all this drama. But perhaps - as in Carloâs case - a democratic vote would be the least of the evils in this matter. The results of this vote are already available.
No. He also posted a video and that was counted.
And I want to emphasize again that I respect Hannah and this poll was NOT made against her or attack her personally.
I just wanted to get a picture how the forum sees the given issue.
If that has any influence on her decision or not is totally up to her and I will respect that as well.
I am happy to have a civilized discussion with everybody here. It is just sad that I get constantly personally attacked by one single user hereâŠ
How do you know this and what would have changed if my video was not counted ?
I did submit a video recorded live from the actually Realm and NOT a private video sent by one of the participants. What has to do one with the other ?
His video contained just a scene from Maya & Rick apartment. I do not see anything bad in thatâŠ
Well the rules say Screenshots but you can see that as a moving screenshot. Videos were also submitted in the previous contests and it never was a problem. So his post is fine in my opinion.
I think he meant because the rules explicitly say screenshots. BUT that would be really splitting hairs by now. The video is a screenshot of a moving event or sceneâŠ
I can count. See table below.
Thatâs not my point at all.
My point is not the extent to which your video entry falsifies the result, but the fact that you have written in dozens of your objections that only screenshots are allowed to count, even though you then submit a video yourself. That is pure irony.
And whether itâs a private video or not doesnât matter. Youâve invalidated your own argument. I donât think thatâs right.
MAYA & RICK
| User | Likes |
|---|---|
| Kade181727 | 12 |
| Kade181728 | 13 |
| Kade181729 | 11 |
| GladNGrumpy | 12 |
| Just_In | 10 |
| John78 | 9 |
| Mekhi207 | 9 |
| PacerColtsFan181062 | 11 |
| Summary | 87 |
I have no problem with that either. But Hannah wrote it. However, she counted the likes on Johnâs video.
Well I think for the next contest the rules should be more clear for sure.
Letâs be realistic: The voting wonât get restarted by now with any different rules or other apartments included and / or excluded.
This would be also not fair with the people who voted there.
All I want is that the places who did that effort get something too. How and in what way this is being done is up to Hannah and that is why I wait for her to show up again. 
And of course clear rules without any changing of them after in the next contest.
The opinion in the forum is quite obvious that a mistake was made thereâŠ
Rules which will be clear. (Example)
Only screenshots and videos of the VHTV livestream or the timeline during the time of the contest are eligable
No room for interpretations here at all.
Let me explain the context once more: The screenshots and screen records (to be more accurate of what my post was) can only be taken from the apartments that weâre watching live, right ? The reason why i repeatedly stated this, was that it was self explanatory from the very start that the Offline apartments can not be part of this contest.
This is how you interpret the rules. But they do not say that. That is why clear rules are needed without changing the rules after the contest.
If a post is not suitable this should be said before the contest ends. And not after.
By the way I am still waiting for your answer for whom you are actually âfightingâ here?
I already understood the context and I never said it was wrong. And honestly, Iâm done with the whole topic. Iâve had enough.
I feel sorry for Hannah the most and I hope that she has the necessary composure to bring the issue to a good end. As I said before, the competition was a great idea and it could have been something very special, but I have the feeling that it wasnât under a good star from the very beginning. The next competitions will certainly go much better. Hope dies last. 
3 Likes
Iâll only say this and iâm also done: Due to the obvious language barriers, the prank theme as well all know it, was very hard to be implemented IMO. The most of what could have been done was the funny moments which everyone can interpret in his own way of understanding.
Amen to that
2 Likes
Well yes of course. Hannah only acted with good intentions here. I still believe (as the majority who voted does) a mistake has been made.
I hope for something cool (A little prize) for the places who got ousted (Just for their efforts) and for more clear rules without getting them changed after in the next contest.
And if a post is against the rules this should be pointed out before the contest ends.
I really do not think more can be said here at the momentâŠ
1 Like
Iâm sure you read the rest of my comment but just in case yes you did actually over complicate it.
I really donât have a stake in this discussion and itâs clear that you want to champion for your favorites which is totally fine and cool, we all have our biases but this seems to be making a bit of a mountain out of a molehill
Can someone DM me when the next episode of this soap opera is about to start, please 
4 Likes