Korsa, Gillian

[Julio137347]

@NaggeDanseGanseDaag

I was about to post the same pic, only to see you already had. Anyway, I think you should have posted only that one pic because a pose like that has more impact when it stands alone. The other pics are generic by comparison and water it down.

[Penta_El_Zero]

This is fantastic

[Penta_El_Zero]

Am I the only one or am I going crazy Nikki and Gillian could be twins​:rofl:

[John78]

You only know one thing and nothing else. No matter how many accounts you’re getting banned, manipulating the forum and the participants, is the only thing you know to do, Mr Heisenberg. How sad is that as a life ?

[jabbath1987]

@Penta_El_Zero

am I going crazy

Only the first photo looks natural The others use way too much post processing (filters)

[John78]

I think you’re going crazy

[Penta_El_Zero]

They could be sisters

[Penta_El_Zero]

There old pictures from like 4 or 5 years ago

[Penta_El_Zero]

I’m know before I get told off back to topic

[WashingtonW]

I think there’s been a misunderstanding. I joined here in late 2024, around last year, and my sole purpose is to contribute constructively to the discussion. What are your inferences about me and the person you’re referring to, and why? When has it been wrong to criticize? If we’re going to continue this conversation, it would be much more beneficial to focus on the main issue rather than making personal accusations. But we can continue discussing this privately if you’d like.

I don’t think there’s any need to digress or confuse the topic. I’d appreciate it if you could correct me if I’m wrong.

[John78]

There is no “issue” other than the one you’re trying to create. You don’t criticize, you manipulate, there is a massive difference. You don’t comment/criticize on something that’s happening in the apartments, you only criticize that they’re not doing porn shows.
There is nothing constructive in your comments on this forum, all you do is to criticize the participants who are not fullfiling some porn fantasies that you have. Well, they don’t have a single reason to do so.
About the “confusion”, there isn’t any, you are the exact same person with the one behind “Heisenberg” and “Footsie maniac” accounts.

[WashingtonW]

I understand, but I disagree with your assumptions. I joined here last year and have no other time. If you truly have documented evidence, I would appreciate seeing it so we can clarify this once and for all. Otherwise, I don’t want to get into endless back-and-forth, so I’ll leave it at that. I think it would be more productive to focus on the forum’s topics rather than personal disputes.
The conversation is over, thank you.

[George290056]

ces pas sont prénoms

[kaya]

Why do you think it’s him?

[WashingtonW]

Hi I’ve joined in forum for discussions in the past to engage constructively. He might have been offended by my posting style and the topics I focused on. My goal is simply to contribute positively to the forum, not to stir up trouble or manipulate anyone. If that’s what he’s thinking or someone thinks like this, and if I’m disturbing someone I can just stay quiet for a bit?

[Sean12984]

It’s awesome that she stays at home today.

[Julio137347]

and naked, too.

[John78]

Same writing style, same “subjects” written about (always complains that no sex, threesomes, swaps, etc). If i put the comments written from both accounts, they’re almost identical, even the same foot fetish

This account appeared right after Heisenberg one was suspended (matter of days)

[NaggeDanseGanseDaag]

---