3 Likes
beautiful set of cheeks at work…
2 Likes
mmm love the passionate cuddling…
1 Like
all sex is entertaining for some of us
2 Likes
Thank you for saving this.
Also, I want to thank you for continuing to keep us informed when you DO save things.
It’s really useful to know that all these things have indeed been archived rather than us wondering if they have and then looking for them, only to be disappointed if we find they haven’t…if that makes sense.
2 Likes
it does, and basically that’s why I do it.
Another reason is, it saves viewer’s time, and MOs, if they know, the sequence was saved, so there is no need for a request in the “archive-savings” topic.
And last not least, if some viewers think about finally buying a subscription, this way they see, what is a part of what they get for it. 
Not my best english, but I hope you still know what I’m trying to express. 
1 Like
To be very honest, the way I wrote my own comment, I can say the same thing as I noticed I had missed a few words out so I had to go back and correct my own mistakes! 
I understood what YOU were saying perfectly.
1 Like
If they come back again we can name them normally we don’t name them unless they come back again.
1 Like
That idea needs to be changed then.
If a person has done something of note (which they have in this case) and it’s been saved in the archives (which apparently it has) then of course they deserve to be named, regardless of whether or not they are just guests passing through and never to be seen again or not.
They were (are) still a valid part of the project and therefore they should be identified as such, just as listed particnts would be. In other words, given names.
They are both exchanging impressions of what they like to do.
3 Likes
