Funny's & Jokes (Part 1)

9 Likes

10 Likes

The Wiener Windmill…dedicated to current and former male participants :joy:

6 Likes


the channel has some really great songs on offer. my current favorite is ‘bankok surprise’ :rofl:

8 Likes

Ah yes, this channel provides the buried gems from the undercurrents of modern popular music. Another one is of course Rectal Potpurri :joy: :joy: :joy:

3 Likes

6 Likes

7 Likes

3 Likes

7 Likes

Makes no sense or there is a grammar error. This is hoax and for sure not a test from Harvard. They will never write 1 children. Rather 1 child. Also why are the numbers written like you have to insert them there by hand? Also makes no sense. On what is it based to write which number there?

Still makes no sense why fill out something manually there? I could have also written three times 0 and the answer would be 0. Test passed with flying colors :joy:

1 Like

If you calculate with with both numbers the same for men, women and children (x) the correct answer is always:
((x+2)x²+x)

If different (Men x) (Women y) and (Children z)

(x+ xz + xyz + xy)

Well, that depends on how you interpret the first line. We interpreted the problem differently. I went with; each husband had one wife. So, my calculation was:

((7 x 7) x 2) + 14 or 8 x 14

Either way my answer was 112.

You figured each husband had 7 wives, which drastically changes the results. For your version, there are exactly 4 times as many people, so your answer is also correct.

1 Like

Let’s call the path with 7 wives EACH man the Muslim path, and with one woman EACH the (theotically) Christian path :wink:
btw: I come to a different conclusion. one wife per man + 7 children = 9 people for each of the 7 families = 9x7 = 63 people

either I have a calculation error somewhere, or another solution to the many possible interpretations of the task

1 Like

It’s a meme. I didn’t create it. I also couldn’t change it, and wouldn’t if I could. I think the numbers were circled just to draw your attention to them, but since I didn’t create it, IDK for sure.

8 Likes

The entire note was handwritten, i.e. written manually.

You just threw (x + 2) in there because that’s the number you needed to make the answer come out correctly.

A less confusing and more accurate way to write that calculation would be:

x³ + (x² * 2) + x = 448 when solving for x=7

1 Like

Each wife AND each husband have 7 children, so that would be 14 children per family. That means 16 people per family times 7 equals 112.

Or x³+2x²+x

2 Likes

Did you know that when you plug a calculation like this into Google, you have to put that * between 2 and x², or it wont calculate? It doesn’t automatically put the * in there for you.