I have stated my opinion, can justify it and stand by it. If all you have to say is a bad joke then I feel sorry for you
John and Jon just get a room you take your frustration out on each other I log on thinking something exciting has happened in the Ariela kingdom and is just a load of waffle
JonR, with all the respect, one more time: Unlike all the rest of the people writing here, youâre not stating opinions but facts. This is what (unintentionally maybe) you donât seem to realise. The simple (and true) fact that you have some more outside info that the rest of the people here do, doesnât automatically mean that your comment is more valid than theirs and thatâs simply because the comments made here are based (strictly) on what is available for all thru the cams. The outside of cams part, it is totally irrelevant for the forum. In fact, there isnât any real need to be brought in as it doesnât change in any way what is happening inside the apartment, isnât it ? This is my whole point, why using irrelevant outside info in order to justify (whitewash) some inside actions ? There is no need to mix the two, we can see (some also understand) by ourselves and make opinions based on the inside actions. Thatâs all i have to say and with this iâm done with this subject.
Tell me⊠how many hairs are in queenâs pussy?
You know everything, I guess you know that.
Youâre the only one my guy, in rest, sheâs smoother than a babyâs ass
I think I have to contradict you here. There is value in information. If Person A has more information, which contradicts a comment by Person B that, lacking this information, is based more on speculation, then Person Aâs comment in that matter is more valid, I would say. That isnât un-democratic. Lack of information does not validate speculation. We shouldnât choose to ignore true information based on whom itâs coming from or whether or not it fits into our narrative.
That would be like not accepting that climate change is man made because âpah, scientists, what do they know?â
Although your point is generally valid, it doesnât really apply this particular situation. I wasnât talking about the speculations made about the outside life but i was strictly referring to the fact that we all have access to the same information here (the images and sound from the cams) and bringing extra info (from outside) is totally irrelevant and doesnât automatically validate the comment/opinion about what is happening on cams inside the apartment. Thatâs all
Oh FFS guys! In regards to Ariela, it is certainly not the apt. that is providing the entertainment, itâs you guys. Donât care care about Ariela or her apt., but the forum thread is certainly entertaining
your post a errorsâŠthe apartment must be renowned ariela jonR and andre85
Please accept my sincere apologies
what are you talking about? talking nonsense again
I think youâre brain-dead from chasing all girls ass in VHTVâŠ
you should take a break.
ı am done with you manâŠ
apology acceptedâŠ
When asking such questions you should expect such answersâŠ
And please, for once, do keep your word:
Cheers
I agree, as long as those comments are strictly about what can be observed in the apartment. But very often the comments go into speculations / conclusions about Arielaâs motivations or outside-of-apartment activities, both of which cannot be observed through the cams, based only on what is observable through the cams. JonR may have more factual information about these motivations / activities. In those cases information trumps speculation.
Totally agree with you about the outside information. As a fact, i will never doubt or challenge JonR about those information, i know since a very long time that heâs not ill intended at all. Again, i am only and strictly referring to what can be observed in the apartment and we all can watch it.
But you also know. Even if we both see the same pictures. We two viewers can also draw two different interpretations from it.
Oh, there are no doubts about it. We see it daily (or almost) in many forum topics. And thatâs quite normal ( to some extent).
Now you have gone full circle. It all started 11 hours ago when Eros and myself were so sinful as to say that we thought it seemed like good friends of Arelaâs who for various reasons stopped by. You raged that we could be so stupid as to call them friends. Now you sit and say that everyone must judge by what they see on the cameras. Thatâs what we did. That you do not agree with our opinion is totally irrelevant. You also promised that you had your say then so donât tell others to keep their word about it (stone in glass house, you know)! I rest my case!
I seriously fail to understand what is so bad in saying that a participants does clickbait on Vhtv⊠Or better said, why is such a big deal on this topic when everywhere else is not a single problem about it ? What is so special about this place that needs to be protected with all costs ?
there were participants that you always defended because they were great for youâŠso do we users who like arielaâŠ