Reading through the thread, I don’t see anyone attacking the participants, can you point me to where they attacked them.
Again it’s not the point and I am not disageeing with you can’t you see that?
I said it was unfair that he didn’t know what he was doing was wrong and gave the reasons why.
I just asked for some simple sensable guidlines of do’s and do not’s, but it’s not going to happen, fine, you have spoken, and we have to listen and agree.
It pointless trying to suggest anything here to help others in knowing what they are doing rightly or wrongly, it really is. Done with it…
Here is the community guidelines https://forum.spyhub.tv/guidelines
and this part applies to what happened here:
Post Only Your Own Stuff
You may not post anything digital that belongs to someone else without permission. You may not post descriptions of, links to, or methods for stealing someone’s intellectual property (software, video, audio, images), or for breaking any other law.
You only see what you like to see
But you are allowed to post media from VHTV you recorded or captured yourself… That is not forbidding posting own vids…
Yeah, that’s the only part in the guidelines that is related to our discussion here. I think it’d be best if VHTV clarifies this a bit further.
Not true, I read the thread carefully . To attack someone in this scenario is to criticise or oppose them vigorously or fiercely, I just didn’t see that.
Again, you just see what you like to see, and nothing I say would change your mind so lets agree to disagree on this one.
I have written many contracts in the past and if you are saying that relates to what happened here then you are (I am really not going to say it) as I don’t like insulting people.
By that definition, you cannot post anything from the participants without their permission first.
Then point me to what I have missed as I have requested previously. If I have missed it, I will gladly apologise to you.
No, VHTV is the copyright holder here not the participants. so they are the one who can decide about this and give permission. if you read my original post, I wrote " it’s not fair " I didn’t say it wasn’t permitted.
it was me who started this in a so called c___dish manner ,so lets be adult they are the most manipulative couple on her ,posting vote for me, we are having a threesome dont do that kyle as Jabbath said it was legal what he done file size.i think they are good at what they do ,but i have never watched their apartment since Tanyas departure as i saw through them then.But as big jock said there are loved which is fine and i hope members get all they wish for from a beautiful couple and there partners as its choice at the end of day.But not me
Then why quote it if it makes no sense or relates to what we are talking about here? Sadly, expecting another twist or irrelevant reply.
Yes, I have read your many comments expressing your dislike for this couple, so it was obvious that you are using this opportunity to criticise and attack them yet again. It’s totally fine to express yourself here as long as you are not insulting anyone. just accept the fact that other members have as much right to criticise you just like you do it to others.
You asked for guidelines, so I posted a link to it in case that you have missed it. and that part was the most relevant to our discussion here. I can’t see what’s so hard to understand here.
And there it is in a nutshell, you do surprise me.
Thats fine but i was not insulting them ,i was tried to stick up for kyle who posts his affection for them and maybe my harsh should of been not nice ok lets leave it now and have a nice day
Ok, I see, you are just like to argue for the sake of it.
And you don’t, because you are keeping up very well. But you are right, enough is enough.
By the way, I would love the opportunity to take this out the forum to message and discuss it civilly with you @Bluewinner to clear the air as to the contrary to what you think I don’t like bad feelings between anyone, but sadly that option is not available as you block it and that’s a shame.