This does not erase previous behavior. “Let’s do what we want, we disrespect those who contribute to pay us and that’s okay”
1 Like
I don’t give a damn if they have sex in secret or not, there are 50 other apartments to keep track of.
I’m just bothered by behavior that I associate with disrespect to customers.
So just vote with your “feet” and watch something else. 
Of course I do, and that’s what I’m going to do, but I’m still from the old school that thinks I have the right to complain when I feel wronged and about things that I think aren’t right.
This sets a precedent or is already a continuation of previous behavior as someone on this forum said.
Today it’s just one because the other one is gone, tomorrow the remaining 49.
1 Like
I don’t gain anything nor do I feel morally better, quite the opposite, for someone, in this case Adel, to be monetarily penalized or to reach the point of settling accounts is not receiving what he was expecting. Until proven otherwise, I have faith in people and I would like it not to come to that.
1 Like
I love Ariela, and I’m all for her making a buck and living a good life, but she should never have been allowed to block cameras in the first place, IMHO.
It’s like someone said, the only thing you can pay for, is a view through the cameras. If you can’t see through the cameras, it’s like paying for a service that’s not being provided.
It should be priority number one, never block, cover, move or in any way hinder the view through the cameras.
6 Likes
Fully agree to that. But it is not on me to tell VHTV what is right or wrong…
1 Like
In my humble opinion, you are absolutely right, but for others with certain responsibilities there is nothing better than washing their hands, like Pontius Pilate. 
1 Like
Hello Jarod528,
When the apartment listing first went live, no cameras were obstructed. Later, one camera was covered again. Our policy is to take an apartment offline only if two cameras are blocked or not working, so we have not done so in this case. Please note that this does not affect the fine, as previously explained to you in our conversation.
The reply you posted here is answering your inquiry to remove the guest from the apartment. As we mentioned, tenants are free to host guests unless a guest is officially banned. Covering a camera does not meet the threshold for removing someone under our guidelines. Again, just fine being issued. I’m afraid it is a bit manipulating not saying the reply goes to your request to remove the guest, not your complain to camera being covered. Because as to camera report, we confirmed the violation, and will apply the appropriate fine. If you have any further questions, please let me know.
The shower camera was purposely obstructed by the guest. And after breaking the rules, is he still in the apartment?
3 Likes
Now THAT makes a lot more sense to me and deserves a bookmark 
Thanks for clarifying.
1 Like
You have every right to complain, you’re not here for free, you’re paying for a sub out of your pocket, you have a legitimate reason to do so, unlike some of these other people 
1 Like
Ironically it was so the people watching on CB couldn’t see the VHTV camera on the wall
2 Likes
Même si c’était volontaire, je pense que le cas d’Ariela est complètement différent. Ça peut arriver de cacher une cam exceptionnellement, Ariela n’a plus rien à prouver. Même si on paie, il ne faut pas non plus devenir des connards.
Le cas d’Adel dur depuis plus de 1 mois, elle ne correspond pas aux idées de VH, et l’argent quelle gagne en jouant sur les limites devrais simplement revenir à d’autres participants qui eux le méritent.
Mais ce n’ai qu’un avis personnel…
1 Like
I still think that “free will” in this case is too much, because the recurrence happened right after. Today I’m the one who’s going to stop watching the little I used to watch, tomorrow it will be others and without doing futurology there will be “left the project”, which harms us all “one less apartment to choose from”.
I am aware of my insignificance in this case, I am a client in ??? So if I stop being a customer I won’t go beyond 0.000..% in the revenue percentage.
But I am aware that just as VH-TV now has the monopoly that took years to build, the market will also adapt if VH-TV fails to meet expectations.
1 Like
I do not think so. Blocking a camera remains blocking a camera. No matter who does it. There should be no exceptions.
4 Likes
Really? There were photos of Webcam streams of other girls posted here and VHTV cameras were visible…
The towel has been removed, but the camera is still showing the viewer at the ceiling. The camera should be returned to its original position, but who decides that? Furthermore, vhtv has once again removed many hours from the stream; this happens far too often.
Wants our money, but gives no FUCKS about their customer satisfaction.
1 Like
The manager needs to inform the participant to fix it.
Well earlier they moved it from the one bathroom and then when they went to use the other bathroom, they put it back up so whatever the hell they doing in there it damn she ain’t six cause that girl will take a shower and let you see everything but other than that, she’s been walking around in the pajamas, the whole time